2012
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0034823
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The OSCAR-IB Consensus Criteria for Retinal OCT Quality Assessment

Abstract: BackgroundRetinal optical coherence tomography (OCT) is an imaging biomarker for neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis (MS). In order to become validated as an outcome measure in multicenter studies, reliable quality control (QC) criteria with high inter-rater agreement are required.Methods/Principal FindingsA prospective multicentre study on developing consensus QC criteria for retinal OCT in MS: (1) a literature review on OCT QC criteria; (2) application of these QC criteria to a training set of 101 retina… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
428
0
3

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 464 publications
(435 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
4
428
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Room light conditions were dimmed and no pharmacological pupil dilation was used. Retinal thickness data were obtained by means of quality controlled automated segmentation of the optic disc (12°ring scan) and macula (20 × 20°, 25 B‐scan composite volume, using the mean thickness of the 1, 3, 6 mm grid) 18, 19. Segmentation of the IRLs consisted of the cumulative thickness from the inner limiting membrane to the outer border of the inner plexiform layer.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Room light conditions were dimmed and no pharmacological pupil dilation was used. Retinal thickness data were obtained by means of quality controlled automated segmentation of the optic disc (12°ring scan) and macula (20 × 20°, 25 B‐scan composite volume, using the mean thickness of the 1, 3, 6 mm grid) 18, 19. Segmentation of the IRLs consisted of the cumulative thickness from the inner limiting membrane to the outer border of the inner plexiform layer.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An independent rater evaluated the quality of the OCT scans according to the OSCAR‐IB Consensus Criteria for Retinal OCT Quality Assessment (Tewarie et al., 2012). Scans with poor quality were excluded from subsequent analysis as well as OCT examinations with incomplete or incorrect scan protocol.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…11 Pharmacological dilatation was performed in all subjects to ensure optimal image quality and to permit careful retinal segmentation. The photographers rejected scans with motion artifacts (discontinuous jump).…”
Section: Examinationmentioning
confidence: 99%