The `Outside-In' Attitude Display Concept Revisited

Previc, Fred H.; Ercoline, William R.

doi:10.1207/s15327108ijap0904_5

Cited by 50 publications

(66 citation statements)

References 28 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Collectively, the present study indicates that the REC effect with the type of response and effects employed here is a reliable phenomenon. Our particular effects were derived from an aviation setting, and the results may be taken to question the usability of horizon-moving displays in planes (see also Previc & Ercoline, 1999). We hesitate, however, to base recommendations on our findings because the actual displays in modern planes are much more complex and integrate different instruments, sometimes even with a synthetic background visualizing a landscape.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 94%

“…Numerous studies from aviation psychology have compared the two display types for both novice and experienced pilots (see Previc & Ercoline, 1999, for a review). These studies converge on the notion that for experienced pilots, there is no clear performance difference between the two display types, but they still prefer the plane-moving display over the horizon-moving display, despite the fact that they have been trained with the latter format.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Response-effect compatibility with complex actions: The case of wheel rotations

Janczyk

Yamaguchi

Proctor

et al. 2015

Atten Percept Psychophys

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The response-effect compatibility (REC) paradigm provides an elegant tool for studying the impact of anticipated action effects on action control. Converging evidence for such anticipative processes has mainly emerged from tasks that require simple, discrete actions, whereas tasks that require more complex, continuous actions such as wheel-rotation responses have yielded discrepant results. We investigate the role of two moderating variables that have only played a minor role in effect-based theories of human action control and may account for this discrepancy: (1) the degree of dimensional overlap (rather than its mere presence) and (2) directing attention towards the action effects. The results of three experiments suggest that both factors are crucial in determining the size of REC effects for continuous wheel-rotation responses: Reliable REC effects were obtained, and they were larger with high than with low dimensional overlap and when attending to the effects than when not. Thus, the study points toward important preconditions that determine whether and how effect anticipations affect complex motor actions.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 94%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Response-effect compatibility with complex actions: The case of wheel rotations

Janczyk

Yamaguchi

Proctor

et al. 2015

Atten Percept Psychophys

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…According to a study regarding flight deck automation (Funk et al, 1999), "poorly designed display" is listed as one of the five contributors most often involved in reported accidents. It has also been suggested that incompatibility between the way information is displayed to pilots and the way the pilots understand the information or make actions in response to the information can result in a control-reversal error, an error in which pilots roll the aircraft in the direction opposite to the intended direction (D. Cohen et al, 2001;Previc & Ercoline, 1999). In the present study, making the corresponding response when the mapping was incongruent falls into the category of control-reversal errors.…”

Section: Practical Implicationsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Stimulus-response compatibility with pure and mixed mappings in a flight task environment.

Yamaguchi¹,

Proctor²

2006

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The present study examined the stimulus-response compatibility (SRC) effect in a simulated flight environment. Experiments 1 and 2 tested the effect with pure and mixed mappings in flight tasks by using attitude displays with inside-out and outside-in formats, whereas Experiments 3 and 4 used a simplified display and tasks. The SRC effect was obtained with mixed mappings when responses were turns of a flight yoke (Experiments 1-3). In contrast, the SRC effect was absent with mixed mappings when they were buttonpresses (Experiment 4). Analyses of sequential effects suggest that the reduction in Experiments 1-3 can be attributed to reduction in the frequency of trials for which the congruent mapping repeats, but the elimination in Experiment 4 cannot be. Implications of the findings are discussed in the context of aviation cockpit design.

show abstract

“…This instrument provides the pilot with information about deviations from level-flight (perfect horizontal flying). Notably, two versions of this instrument are available (Previc, Ercoline, 1999; see also Fig. 1).…”

Section: Markus Janczyk Wilfried Kunde Department Of Psychology IIImentioning

confidence: 99%

12th Biannual conference of the German cognitive science society (Gesellschaft für Kognitionswissenschaft)

Butz¹

2014

Cogn Process

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The `Outside-In' Attitude Display Concept Revisited

Cited by 50 publications

References 28 publications

Response-effect compatibility with complex actions: The case of wheel rotations

Response-effect compatibility with complex actions: The case of wheel rotations

Stimulus-response compatibility with pure and mixed mappings in a flight task environment.

12th Biannual conference of the German cognitive science society (Gesellschaft für Kognitionswissenschaft)

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About