The Overseas Indian and the political economy of the body in Aravind Adiga’s The White Tiger and Amitav Ghosh’s The Hungry Tide

Abstract

In the often highly-charged cultural politics of India, difference is played out in various ways, including in gendered, religious, and social terms. A newer and less obvious difference emerges as India struggles to attract foreign investment to the country, beginning with the cultural and economic campaign to engage Non-Resident Indians (NRIs) -or Overseas Indians, to use the term now growing in popularity -and to kindle their interest in the homeland. The cultural and ideological gap between the Overseas Indian and the local or resident Indian, ostentatiously noted in literary narratives, marks the gap between India's ambitions to become a global socio-economy, and the reality of its present socio-economic state and its anxieties about globalization. In texts such as Adiga's The White Tiger and Ghosh's The Hungry Tide, this gap (despite the differences between the texts) ultimately appears to be persistent and insurmountable. The obduracy of the local Indian's cultural corpus, its resistance to the seemingly more dependent and malleable condition of the Overseas Indian, speaks not only of the persistence of the local against the global in India (contra many discourses of a rampant globalization), but also of anxieties about local problematics (corruption, social injustice, reactionary culture) which are not easily remediable. Global ambitions, local reservations, and the Indian bodyIndia, lauded over the last two decades or so as one of the emerging global economic powerhouses (together with Brazil, Russia, and China -known collectively in

Postcolonial feminism?

“…Robbie Goh's (2012) essay examines the unbridgeable material and cultural chasm between the Overseas Indian and the local or resident Indian in Aravind Adiga's The White Tiger and Amitav Ghosh's The Hungry Tide, suggesting that the resident Indian's body "becomes the ideological and symbolic battleground in which this foreign-local distinction is played out" (Goh, 2012: 342). Marakand Paranjape (2012) also scrutinizes Ghosh's fiction, but to some extent challenges the dominant critical discourse which applauds him for representing "the subalterns who have been passed over by both the imperialists and the nationalists, those labouring classes whose sweat and toil built empires and nations, but who have been swept aside" (Paranjape, 2012: 370).…”

Fragmentation of Federation: A Study in the Select Novels of Amitav Ghosh and Aravind Adiga

“…Other cycles, such as internationalization, outline 'transnational' networks by requiring the establishment of new definitive constructs on a large scale. These give the impression of having control over an increasing number of social and political areas of one's life [2]. The political dynamic is becoming increasingly unstable as a result of these developments, and vote-based control systems that have traditionally worked within the framework of the nation-state appear to be disintegrating.…”