2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.omtm.2023.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The p53 challenge of hematopoietic stem cell gene editing

Sofie R. Dorset,
Rasmus O. Bak
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our data are in line with reports on the use of AAV6 for template delivery in HDR-based editing, 55 , 56 , 57 indicating that the observed genotoxicity may be due to activation of p53-mediated DNA damage response upon concomitant exposure of HSPCs to CRISPR-induced DSBs and prolonged persistence of AAV genomes (ITRs) in the edited cells. 58 , 59 We cannot judge on the potential toxic effects mediated by IDLV template delivery in HSCs as no correction was achieved with our construct. Another potential challenge with our approach could arise from the fact that the HDR mechanism specifically targets cycling cells (S/G2 phase), raising the possibility that a large fraction of dormant, long-term reconstituting HSCs will not be targeted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our data are in line with reports on the use of AAV6 for template delivery in HDR-based editing, 55 , 56 , 57 indicating that the observed genotoxicity may be due to activation of p53-mediated DNA damage response upon concomitant exposure of HSPCs to CRISPR-induced DSBs and prolonged persistence of AAV genomes (ITRs) in the edited cells. 58 , 59 We cannot judge on the potential toxic effects mediated by IDLV template delivery in HSCs as no correction was achieved with our construct. Another potential challenge with our approach could arise from the fact that the HDR mechanism specifically targets cycling cells (S/G2 phase), raising the possibility that a large fraction of dormant, long-term reconstituting HSCs will not be targeted.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Depending on the desired edit and target locus, numerous factors and challenges can impair genome modification efficiencies, some of which include: (1) inefficient delivery of the gene editing system [ 12 , 13 ], (2) toxicity caused by delivery modality and exposure to gene editing components [ 14 16 ], (3) restriction to a narrow target sequence window with inefficient nuclease target sites, which could be caused by complex target sequences with repetitive elements, unusual GC content, or a dense chromatin state [ 17 , 18 ], and (4) quiescent cells without an active endogenous repair machinery [ 11 , 19 ]. Consequently, suboptimal gene editing efficiencies may hamper the use of gene editing technologies for some applications [ 1 , 20 ].…”
Section: The Bottlenecks Of Genome Editingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The presence of foreign nucleic acids triggers DNA damage response (DDR) pathways, leading to cell-cycle arrest, transcriptional blockage, reduced proliferation, and potentially apoptosis. 28 , 29 Ensuring safety in the various aspects described is of utmost importance, particularly as Cas9-based therapeutic GE has entered clinical trials. Several talks focused on establishing a standardized protocol for the measurement and evaluation of on- and off-target activity, which included generating big data to develop models that better predict off-target activity.…”
Section: Safety Issues Related To Ge Therapeutic Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%