2006
DOI: 10.1007/s10734-005-7695-z
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The paradox in international cooperation: Institutionally embedded universities in a global environment

Abstract: Abstract. As a response to processes of globalisation and regional integration, internationalisation activities in universities have changed. Flows have become more massive, the range of activities has broadened, and internationalisation has shifted from a marginal activity to a central institutional issue with strategic importance (van der Wende 2001, European Journal of Education 36(4), 431-441). These shifts can also be observed in international cooperation among universities. One of the manifestations of t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The two most-used approaches to defi ning internationalization, which also have a direct impact on international students, are the activity approach described as a series of activities, programs, and services ( Harari, 1977( Harari, , 1989Arum and Van de Water, 1992 ), research, scholarly, and international organization collaboration ( Beerkens and Derwende, 2007 ), export of knowledge and education ( Harman, 2002 ;Mazzarol and Soutar, 2002a ), and the process approach that involves policies ( Callan, 1998 ;Enders, 2004 ) and moves the higher educational institutions in an international direction ( Schoorman, 1999 ;Harman, 2005 ). Harari defi ned internationalization as " the international content of the curricula, the international movement of scholars and students concerned with training and research, and the arrangements that engage a system of education cooperation programs beyond its national boundaries " (1977, p. 2293), while Knight sees internationalization as " the process of integrating an international / intercultural dimension into the teaching, research and service functions of the institution " (1999, p. 16).…”
Section: Internationalization and Marketingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The two most-used approaches to defi ning internationalization, which also have a direct impact on international students, are the activity approach described as a series of activities, programs, and services ( Harari, 1977( Harari, , 1989Arum and Van de Water, 1992 ), research, scholarly, and international organization collaboration ( Beerkens and Derwende, 2007 ), export of knowledge and education ( Harman, 2002 ;Mazzarol and Soutar, 2002a ), and the process approach that involves policies ( Callan, 1998 ;Enders, 2004 ) and moves the higher educational institutions in an international direction ( Schoorman, 1999 ;Harman, 2005 ). Harari defi ned internationalization as " the international content of the curricula, the international movement of scholars and students concerned with training and research, and the arrangements that engage a system of education cooperation programs beyond its national boundaries " (1977, p. 2293), while Knight sees internationalization as " the process of integrating an international / intercultural dimension into the teaching, research and service functions of the institution " (1999, p. 16).…”
Section: Internationalization and Marketingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, financial profit is the primary purpose in the business world. Consequently, CDs act as stimuli for UK and Chinese universities to cooperate, which support Beerkens and Derwende (2007) view that the national origins of partnering universities are important sources of complementarity in HE. Evidence from this research suggests that the ability to offer different cultural elements is an important attraction of China-UK HE SAs (Olie 1990;Meirovich 2010).…”
Section: Discussion and Implications Of The Researchmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…Other issues related to multicampus programmes are the travel between the campuses, problems with effective distancelearning technology, problems with standardising operations between campuses, and the inability to communicate effectively between campuses (Harrison, Congdon, and Di Piro 2010). Indeed, a good relationship between the campuses is crucial for good cooperation, and it is clear that the relation and communication among the individuals of the consortium members play important roles (Beerkens and van der Wende 2007). In addition, a high faculty workload due to multicampus education was reported (Harrison, Congdon, and Di Piro 2010).…”
Section: Driving Forces and Obstacles For Multicampus Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%