2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2015.04.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The paradox of control: An ethnographic analysis of opiate maintenance treatment in a Norwegian prison

Abstract: The article demonstrates that an unbalanced and control-dominated approach to prison-based OMT may have the opposite effect of what is intended.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
19
0
19

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
2
19
0
19
Order By: Relevance
“…employed in drug rehabilitation programmes) observed and interviewed for the research used in this article, and the specific context of the two drug rehabilitation programmes, must be considered when interpreting the findings and considering their implications. For instance, the defiant meaning attached to drug use reported by some of the prisoners in this study should be seen in relation to the ''legitimacy deficits'' of the two drug rehabilitation programmes (see also Mjåland, 2015). Crucially, however, this should not solely be seen as a limitation regarding the empirical generalisability of the findings reported here, but also as an illustration of an important argument the article proposes, namely, that context specific analysis of how drug use is given meaning to by prisoners can tell us a great deal about how prisoners experience and perceive of the terms of their captivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…employed in drug rehabilitation programmes) observed and interviewed for the research used in this article, and the specific context of the two drug rehabilitation programmes, must be considered when interpreting the findings and considering their implications. For instance, the defiant meaning attached to drug use reported by some of the prisoners in this study should be seen in relation to the ''legitimacy deficits'' of the two drug rehabilitation programmes (see also Mjåland, 2015). Crucially, however, this should not solely be seen as a limitation regarding the empirical generalisability of the findings reported here, but also as an illustration of an important argument the article proposes, namely, that context specific analysis of how drug use is given meaning to by prisoners can tell us a great deal about how prisoners experience and perceive of the terms of their captivity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…better sentencing conditions and social services). Finally, drug use, distribution and exchange were for some of the participants meaningful subversive and oppositional activities, and these activities should partly be interpreted as reactions towards perceived unfair and illegitimate practices in the drug rehabilitation programmes, most notably the strict drug control measures that were employed (for more detailed analysis, see Mjåland, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Most qualitative studies with incarcerated heroin users have focused on a specific issue, such as drug treatment, 27,28 injecting drug use, 29 status and social relations, 30 drug dealing, 19 and prison opiate substitute programme. 31 However, heroin use is a phenomenological experience that has multiple dimensions and needs to be explored beyond its behavioural, social and environmental component. It fundamentally concerns individuals' inner worlds and therefore necessarily exists also on a psychological level.…”
Section: 18mentioning
confidence: 99%