2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.05.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The paradox of intensification

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
59
0
5

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
59
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…However, intensification can also lead to congestion on the transportation network, which might cause accessibility to decrease and negative externalities to increase because of the concentration of cars and traffic. This is called the "intensification paradox" (Melia, Parkhurst, and Barton 2011). In large cities, this might result in more, not less, traveling because of negative agglomeration effects, causing people and jobs to move farther out (Ferreira and Batey 2011;Wheeler 2009), although this still benefits residents because of increased choice and opportunities (van Wee 2011).…”
Section: How Intensification Affects Tlu Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, intensification can also lead to congestion on the transportation network, which might cause accessibility to decrease and negative externalities to increase because of the concentration of cars and traffic. This is called the "intensification paradox" (Melia, Parkhurst, and Barton 2011). In large cities, this might result in more, not less, traveling because of negative agglomeration effects, causing people and jobs to move farther out (Ferreira and Batey 2011;Wheeler 2009), although this still benefits residents because of increased choice and opportunities (van Wee 2011).…”
Section: How Intensification Affects Tlu Planningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This increase in land-use densities and mix, which we call "urban intensification," is also expected to protect natural resources, such as agricultural land and clean air, and to support better use of social services (Hull 2011). However, it has also been noted that without consistent urban transport policies, intensification-related costs (e.g., congestion, pollution) instead of benefits might prevail (Ferreira and Batey 2011;Melia, Parkhurst, and From integrated aims to fragmented outcomes: Urban intensification and transportation planning in the Netherlands Barton 2011;Niemeier, Bai, and Handy 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the study concluded that TRICS results are not accurate for housing developments. In contrast, several researchers such as Melia et.al [14] and Oni [15] have used TRICS as a tool to predict trip rates for developments with specific site and socioeconomic characteristics.…”
Section: Trics and Data Processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This difficulty is related to the complexity of the movements undertaken by a population that define lines of desire for mobility that are not very clear in space and time. In fact, the linearity of commuting, associated with the expansion of cities of the past, appears now dimmed by a wide range of destinations that each develops for his/her everyday life, largely caused by the speed of the transformation and specialization of land use (Melia et al [11]). Nowadays, a journey is rarely constituted by a single trip and, either it includes long miles, or it is shared by various paths of very short distance (Banister [12]).…”
Section: (De)fragmentation Of the Network Of Public Transport And Modmentioning
confidence: 99%