2013
DOI: 10.7771/1481-4374.2388
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Paradox of Testimony and First-Person Plural Narration in Jensen's We, the Drowned

Abstract: Dedicated to the dissemination of scholarly and professional information, Purdue University Press selects, develops, and distributes quality resources in several key subject areas for which its parent university is famous, including business, technology, health, veterinary medicine, and other selected disciplines in the humanities and sciences.CLCWeb: Comparative Literature and Culture, the peer-reviewed, full-text, and open-access learned journal in the humanities and social sciences, publishes new scholarshi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…What might be opened up, revealed or foreclosed in telling a recovery story in the first-person plural? Could narratological analysis of ''we-narration'' (Richardson 2006;Bekhta 2017), particularly with respect to testimonies of shared traumatic experience (Dwivedi and Nielsen 2013), offer promising avenues for exploring the storytelling made possible by collective voices? This might this, in turn, connect with recent work in geography and anthropology on ''relational'' models of recovery (Price-Robertson, Obradovic, and Morgan 2017; Price-Robertson, Manderson, and Duff 2017) attuned to notions of affective atmosphere (Duff 2016).…”
Section: Conclusion: a Call For Alternative Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What might be opened up, revealed or foreclosed in telling a recovery story in the first-person plural? Could narratological analysis of ''we-narration'' (Richardson 2006;Bekhta 2017), particularly with respect to testimonies of shared traumatic experience (Dwivedi and Nielsen 2013), offer promising avenues for exploring the storytelling made possible by collective voices? This might this, in turn, connect with recent work in geography and anthropology on ''relational'' models of recovery (Price-Robertson, Obradovic, and Morgan 2017; Price-Robertson, Manderson, and Duff 2017) attuned to notions of affective atmosphere (Duff 2016).…”
Section: Conclusion: a Call For Alternative Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%