2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.electstud.2005.12.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The parliamentary election in Slovenia, October 2004

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A stronger focus on denying territorial access to asylum-seekers as a result of tougher border control can negate commitments made by Member States to respect international standards. NGOs were concerned that asylum policy was actually regressing with a lowering of standards and uncritical adoption of EU legislation weakening of domestic protection standards (Toplak 2006). This was evident in the hostility to Iranian migrants who entered Slovenia via Bosnia in 2000 who were vilified and sometimes physically attacked (Thomson 2006: 11).…”
Section: Sloveniamentioning
confidence: 98%
“…A stronger focus on denying territorial access to asylum-seekers as a result of tougher border control can negate commitments made by Member States to respect international standards. NGOs were concerned that asylum policy was actually regressing with a lowering of standards and uncritical adoption of EU legislation weakening of domestic protection standards (Toplak 2006). This was evident in the hostility to Iranian migrants who entered Slovenia via Bosnia in 2000 who were vilified and sometimes physically attacked (Thomson 2006: 11).…”
Section: Sloveniamentioning
confidence: 98%
“…3-31). According to their origin, power holders are original, i.e., they are appointed, or in modern times of democracy, some of them are also elected (Toplak, 2004: 1) 3 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enhanced border security can, but not necessarily does, reduce a state's commitment to international, including, EU standards. A common theme in NGO interviews was that policy-making had regressed into an uncritical adoption of EU policy and a watering down of protection standards (see also Toplak 2006). There was little contestation of EU policy at the elite level.…”
Section: Sloveniamentioning
confidence: 99%