2017
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx1620
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The pebbles/boulders size distributions on Sais: Rosetta’s final landing site on comet 67P/Churyumov–Gerasimenko

Abstract: By using the imagery acquired by the Optical, Spectroscopic, and Infrared Remote Imaging System Wide-Angle Camera (OSIRIS WAC), we prepare a high-resolution morphological map of the Rosetta Sais final landing site, characterized by an outcropping consolidated terrain unit, a coarse boulder deposit and a fine particle deposit. Thanks to the 0.014 m resolution images, we derive the pebbles/boulders size-frequency distribution (SFD) of the area in the size range of 0.07-0.70 m. Sais' SFD is best fitted with a two… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

7
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the large number of particles with sizes smaller than 0.7 cm, such a break in the SFD could be a real result of intrinsic surface processes that deplete the smallest sizes when they form. Nevertheless, a more likely possibility is that such rollover may be the result of an observation bias, where fewer smaller particles are identified, in a similar fashion to the pixel resolution limit when pebbles are identified on surfaces (e.g., Pajola et al, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the large number of particles with sizes smaller than 0.7 cm, such a break in the SFD could be a real result of intrinsic surface processes that deplete the smallest sizes when they form. Nevertheless, a more likely possibility is that such rollover may be the result of an observation bias, where fewer smaller particles are identified, in a similar fashion to the pixel resolution limit when pebbles are identified on surfaces (e.g., Pajola et al, 2017).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(c) The absorbed flux on the five locations based on Models B and C of Keller et al (2015b). ice sublimation and dust ejection due to 'self-cleaning' (Pajola et al 2017c;Fulle et al 2019) reduces both the deposits' thickness and the amount of small-size boulders, resulting in the shallower trend that we observe with the SFD analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Following the same approach used in Pajola et al (2015) and Pajola et al (2017c), and given the wide statistics of boulders that we have on Hapi, we decided to derive the boulder SFD from localized areas that are characterized by homogeneous geological settings. We then made use of the geological map presented in Fig.…”
Section: Boulder Size-frequency Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A layer of decimetre-sized dust particles (cp. Pajola et al 2017) would thereafter have a ten times higher permeability than a layer of the same thickness of centimetre-sized particles. A higher gas permeability of the dust layer would result in a reduced pressure build-up and thus reduced dust production.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%