2020
DOI: 10.1037/pas0000888
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Peer Victimization in College Survey: Construction and validation.

Abstract: Colleges and universities are increasingly concerned about respect for diversity and tolerance of individual differences on their campuses. Nevertheless, no comprehensive measure of peer victimization has been developed and validated for use with college student populations. The Peer Victimization in College Survey (PVIC) is the first such measure. Study 1 (N ϭ 733) reports how PVIC items were empirically derived to ensure construct coverage. Study 2 (N ϭ 100) reports how intuitive PVIC subscales were establis… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly. PEER VICTIMIZATION TYPOLOGY has shown to be somewhat inferior to Likert-type scaling options (see Cole et al, 2020). and importantly, our analyses do not account the potential effects of cultural or individual differences.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This article is intended solely for the personal use of the individual user and is not to be disseminated broadly. PEER VICTIMIZATION TYPOLOGY has shown to be somewhat inferior to Likert-type scaling options (see Cole et al, 2020). and importantly, our analyses do not account the potential effects of cultural or individual differences.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The item and subscale constructions of PVIC were empirically keyed from nationally representative college student samples. The PVIC has good convergent, discriminant, incremental, and criterion validity (see Study 3 in Cole et al, 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations