2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.humov.2016.03.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The pendular mechanism does not determine the optimal speed of loaded walking on gradients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
16
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Specific mechanisms regulating this transfer will be analyzed in future study. The effects of different speeds on biomechanic and energetic responses in our study are in line with previous studies in adults [36,53,54] and even in elderly [5]. Interestingly, our study showed that speed-cost profiles were altered by endurance training.…”
Section: Effects Of Nw Training In the Energetics And Biomechanics Ofsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Specific mechanisms regulating this transfer will be analyzed in future study. The effects of different speeds on biomechanic and energetic responses in our study are in line with previous studies in adults [36,53,54] and even in elderly [5]. Interestingly, our study showed that speed-cost profiles were altered by endurance training.…”
Section: Effects Of Nw Training In the Energetics And Biomechanics Ofsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…But because we already observed that both the energy cost and the kinematics of level locomotion were not affected by this MUM (Vernillo et al, 2014b), we did not include this condition. Since the reference condition was the one previously investigated during this MUM (Vernillo et al, 2014b), we cannot exclude that the conditions applied were not the ones to minimize the energy expenditure during graded walking and running (Minetti et al, 2002; Gomeñuka et al, 2014, 2016). However, all efforts were made to reduce that bias, identifying with pilot work that the energy costs were not significantly different across conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This sample was chosen to examine both genders and individuals with small/medium and large/extra-large sized feet. Since this was a gait assessment study, the sample size was set at 20 participants, which is consistent with recent gait-based literature [11][12][13][14]. The study was approved for human subjects testing under the University's Institutional Review Board (IRB; protocol #17-725).…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%