2005
DOI: 10.1001/archderm.141.11.1388
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Performance of SolarScan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
34
0
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 130 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(8 reference statements)
0
34
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, dermoscopy [8] is a noninvasive diagnostic technique that links clinical dermatology and dermatopathology by enabling the visualization of morphological features which are not discernible by examination with the naked eye. There are different techniques, like solar scan [9], epiluminescence microscopy (ELM) [10, 11], cross-polarization epiluminescence (XLM), and side transillumination (TLM) [12, 13], that can greatly increase the morphological details that are visualized. Thus, they provide additional diagnostic criteria to the dermatologist.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, dermoscopy [8] is a noninvasive diagnostic technique that links clinical dermatology and dermatopathology by enabling the visualization of morphological features which are not discernible by examination with the naked eye. There are different techniques, like solar scan [9], epiluminescence microscopy (ELM) [10, 11], cross-polarization epiluminescence (XLM), and side transillumination (TLM) [12, 13], that can greatly increase the morphological details that are visualized. Thus, they provide additional diagnostic criteria to the dermatologist.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, it has also been demonstrated that dermoscopy may actually lower the diagnostic accuracy in the hands of inexperienced dermatologists [10, 1820], since this method requires great deal of experience to differentiate skin lesions [21]. As described in [9, 22] only experts have arrived at 90% sensitivity and 59% specificity in skin lesion diagnosis, while for less trained doctors these figures show significant drop till around 62%-63% for general practitioners.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…40-45 Some have achieved a degree of sensitivity and specificity approaching expert dermoscopists. 37,43,45-48 On the basis of these encouraging results, scientists are working to develop fully automated diagnosis systems. 38,43,49 …”
Section: Computer-assisted Diagnosis Of Pigmented Lesionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study may be reported for the first time in the international, which will lay foundations for solving the key problem of intellectualized recognition for CMM in the yellow race [7,8] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%