PsycEXTRA Dataset 2007
DOI: 10.1037/e518532013-138
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The perils of accentuating the positive

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Changing executives' beliefs about the nature of leadership is tough and not made any easier by those who argue that people don't change and therefore should be played only to their strengths (for a detailed analysis of the flaws in this argument see Kaiser, 2009).…”
Section: How We Shot Ourselves In the Footmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changing executives' beliefs about the nature of leadership is tough and not made any easier by those who argue that people don't change and therefore should be played only to their strengths (for a detailed analysis of the flaws in this argument see Kaiser, 2009).…”
Section: How We Shot Ourselves In the Footmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effective developmental feedback promotes a balanced and authentic view of the employee's current state. We believe that this notion of balance often gets lost when scholars and practitioners approach organizational behavior from a positive perspective, a concern echoed by Fineman (2006) and Kaiser (2009). Positive psychology is often applied within a one-sided framework in which the focus is purely on personal strengths.…”
Section: Positive Perspectives On Negative Feedbackmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Improved organizational effectiveness is attainable by identifying and modifying leadership strengths and dysfunctional dispositions that influence employee engagement, job satisfaction, and burnout. Historically, the popularity and delusional optimism of positive psychology has led to excessive focus on leadership strengths (Kaiser, 2009) to the detriment of failure to address weaknesses demonstrated by leaders. Too strong a focus on leadership strengths obscures the notion that leadership weaknesses exist, which increases derailment (Gentry, Mondore, & Cox, 2007;Lombardo, Ruderman, & McCauley, 1988).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%