“…There is little difference in cardiovascular and respiratory effects between the three agents (Hikasa Halothane 0.76% (Valverde and Doherty, 2008) 0.69% (Valverde and Doherty, 2008) 0.96 ± 0.12% (Hikasa et al, 1998) 1.3 ± 0.1% (Antognini and Eisele, 1993) Isoflurane 1.14 ± 0.01% (Cantalapiedra et al, 2000) 1.19-1.53% (Valverde and Doherty, 2008) 1.31 ± 0.03% (Doherty et al, 2002b) 1.29 ± 0.11% (Hikasa et al, 1998) 1.5 ± 0.3% (Antognini and Eisele, 1993) Desflurane Not reported 9.5% (Lukasik et al, 1998a) Not reported Sevoflurane Not reported 3.3% (Lukasik et al, 1998b) 2.33 ± 0.15% (Hikasa et al, 1998) MAC values for calves are assumed to be similar to adult cattle. More rapid recovery of the animal anesthetized with sevoflurane may be advantageous in specific situations such as anesthesia of pre-weanling lambs (Vettorato et al, 2012;Clutton et al, 2014). Because sevoflurane is approximately seven times the cost of isoflurane and a higher MAC is required for a surgical plane of anesthesia, any advantages of this agent may be outweighed by the cost per volume of inhalant needed (Sellers et al, 2013).…”