2023
DOI: 10.1002/ecs2.4329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The persistence and conversion of coastal foredune and swale vegetation community distributions 63 years later

Abstract: Vegetation shifts can directly alter habitat dynamics and indirectly impact habitat stability relative to disturbance response. Barrier island dune habitats exhibit spatiotemporally dynamic topography that is affected by vegetation. However, vegetation distribution data can be rare and vegetation persistence is largely unknown such that species turnover over in communities can occur unnoticed. This is true despite concerns and documented cases of woody encroachment related to climate change in these ecogeomorp… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 53 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, monitoring IAPs on dynamic dune mosaics by traditional approaches performed through field campaigns is both resource-intensive and costly. The field campaigns often cover limited areas due to accessibility constraints, and historical distribution maps required for monitoring invasion dynamics at landscape scale, are frequently unavailable (Müllerova et al 2017;Cascone et al 2021, Charbonneau et al 2023. Consequently, the temporal changes of invasion process were barely explored and focused on limited number of IAP as Acacia saligna (Kutiel et al 2004), Carex arenaria (Nielsen et al 2011), Oenothera drummondii (Gallego-Fernández et al 2019, Carex kobomugi (Charbonneau et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, monitoring IAPs on dynamic dune mosaics by traditional approaches performed through field campaigns is both resource-intensive and costly. The field campaigns often cover limited areas due to accessibility constraints, and historical distribution maps required for monitoring invasion dynamics at landscape scale, are frequently unavailable (Müllerova et al 2017;Cascone et al 2021, Charbonneau et al 2023. Consequently, the temporal changes of invasion process were barely explored and focused on limited number of IAP as Acacia saligna (Kutiel et al 2004), Carex arenaria (Nielsen et al 2011), Oenothera drummondii (Gallego-Fernández et al 2019, Carex kobomugi (Charbonneau et al 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%