1979
DOI: 10.1093/jac/5.5.621
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The pharmacokinetics of oral and intravenous metronidazole in man

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

9
17
0
2

Year Published

1981
1981
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
9
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Plasma clearance, volume of distribution and half-life values reported here are consistent with published data in normal volunteers (Houghton et al, 1979) and patients with cirrhosis (Daneshmend et al, 1982).…”
Section: Sulphapyridinesupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Plasma clearance, volume of distribution and half-life values reported here are consistent with published data in normal volunteers (Houghton et al, 1979) and patients with cirrhosis (Daneshmend et al, 1982).…”
Section: Sulphapyridinesupporting
confidence: 91%
“…W. During repeated dosing of healthy subjects accumulation of metronidazole occurs and steady-state plasma metronidazole concentrations rise to about twice the concentrations observed after a single dose (Houghton et al, 1979b). The results of this study suggest that in patients with renal insufficiency, no further accumulation of metronidazole will occur.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…The sex or age of subjects has been shown not to markedly alter the pharmacokinetics of intravenous metronidazole (Houghton et al, 1979b). Weight differences may be expected to proportionately alter AUC and volume of distribution parameters in Table 1 (Gulaid et al, 1978).…”
Section: Introduction Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been assumed that this advantage is caused by the high lipid/water partition coefficient and the long elimination half-life of tinidazole (Charuel et al, 1981;Houghton et al, 1982). Here the serum concentrations of either drug were equal to concentrations previously reported (Jokipii et al, 1977;Charuel et al, 1981;Houghton et (Amon & Amon, 1980). Exact comparisons are nevertheless difficult because of differences in drug dosage, route of administration and analytical method.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%