The Pharmacological Channel Revisited: Alcohol Sales Restrictions and Crime in Bogota

Abstract

Standard-Nutzungsbedingungen:Die Dokumente auf EconStor dürfen zu eigenen wissenschaftlichen Zwecken und zum Privatgebrauch gespeichert und kopiert werden.Sie dürfen die Dokumente nicht für öffentliche oder kommerzielle Zwecke vervielfältigen, öffentlich ausstellen, öffentlich zugänglich machen, vertreiben oder anderweitig nutzen.Sofern die Verfasser die Dokumente unter Open-Content-Lizenzen (insbesondere CC-Lizenzen) zur Verfügung gestellt haben sollten, gelten abweichend von diesen Nutzungsbedingungen die in der dort genannten Lizenz gewährten Nutzungsrechte. The opinions expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Inter-American Development Bank, its Board of Directors, or the countries they represent. Terms of use: Documents inThe unauthorized commercial use of Bank documents is prohibited and may be punishable under the Bank's policies and/or applicable laws.Copyright © Inter-American Development Bank. This working paper may be reproduced for any non-commercial purpose. It may also be reproduced in any academic journal indexed by the American Economic Association's EconLit, with previous consent by the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB), provided that the IDB is credited and that the author(s) receive no income from the publication. This paper attempts to evaluate the impact on crime of the restriction of late-night alcohol sales in Bogota and quantify the causal effect of problematic alcohol consumption on different crime categories. It is found that the restriction reduced deaths and injuries in car accidents and batteries. The results are stronger in areas where the restriction was actually binding and are highly heterogeneous depending on the number of liquor stores restricted at the block level. Finally, the paper measures the impact of the restriction on alcohol consumption (the first stage, or mechanism), and quantifies the causal pharmacological impact of alcohol consumption on crime using the restriction as an instrument for problematic alcohol consumption (the second stage). The results indicate that a one standard deviation (s.d.) increase in problematic alcohol consumption increases deaths and injuries in car accidents by 0.51 s.d and 0.82 s.d. respectively, and batteries by 1.27 s.d. Cataloging-in-Publication JEL classifications: C2, C54, D04Keywords: Alcohol restrictions, Crime, Pharmacological channel 1 We thank the Corporación Andina para el Fomento (CAF) and the IDB Visiting Scholars Program for financial support for this paper. We wish to thank Adriana Camacho, Ximena Peña, Juan Fernando Vargas, Roman David Zárate, Angela Lulle, Ernesto Schargrodsky, Rodrigo Soares, Laura Chioda, Daniel Ortega, an anonymous referee and seminar participants at the IDB and UniAndes for their comments and suggestions that helped improved this paper significantly. Also, we thank Fundación Ideas para la Paz (FIP) for providing the crime data used in this paper. The usual disclaimer applies.2

Wet Laws, Drinking Establishments and Violent Crime

“…There is an extensive literature on the relationship between alcohol availability and crime . For example, researchers have studied the effects of alcohol taxes (Cook and Moore, ; Markowitz, , , ; Markowitz and Grossman, ; DeSimone, ; Cook and Piette Durrance, ), Federal Prohibition (Miron, ; Owens, ), the minimum legal drinking age (Joksch and Jones, ; Carpenter, ; Carpenter and Dobkin, ), underage drunk driving laws (Carpenter, , ), restrictions on weekend sales (Heaton, ; Grönqvist and Niknami, ) and early closing times for bars and restaurants (Chikritzhs and Stockwell, ; Hough and Hunter, ; Biderman et al ., ; De Mello et al ., )…”

Approach Paper: Citizen Security in Latin America and the Caribbean: IDB's Comparative Advantage

“…There are also results for other areas in LAC, including for Bogotá (De Mello et al, 2013). A recent paper by Di Tella and Schargrodsky (2010) suggests that electronic monitoring can be an effective alternative to incarceration in deterring recidivism.…”