2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2021.108602
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The phenomics and genetics of addictive and affective comorbidity in opioid use disorder

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 159 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, we found that the OUD group had unique characteristics compared to the other groups, the most salient of which included comorbid psychiatric (anxiety, depression) and substance use disorders, particularly tobacco use disorders, in line with previous findings (Barry et al, 2016;Edlund et al, 2010;Nazarian et al, 2021;Volkow et al, 2019). Prior studies estimated that 45-57% of individuals with OUD had at least one psychiatric disorder and reported that polysubstance abuse was exceedingly common (Freda et al, 2021), comparable to our findings. In addition, average age at first opioid prescription among the OUD group was approximately 10 years younger than that of other groups, highlighting the importance of age at first exposure to prescribed opioids and onset of OUD (Phillips et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, we found that the OUD group had unique characteristics compared to the other groups, the most salient of which included comorbid psychiatric (anxiety, depression) and substance use disorders, particularly tobacco use disorders, in line with previous findings (Barry et al, 2016;Edlund et al, 2010;Nazarian et al, 2021;Volkow et al, 2019). Prior studies estimated that 45-57% of individuals with OUD had at least one psychiatric disorder and reported that polysubstance abuse was exceedingly common (Freda et al, 2021), comparable to our findings. In addition, average age at first opioid prescription among the OUD group was approximately 10 years younger than that of other groups, highlighting the importance of age at first exposure to prescribed opioids and onset of OUD (Phillips et al, 2017).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Opioid use disorder ( OUD ) evolves from a series of opioid consumption transitions, starting with exposure and continuing through regular use, misuse, abuse, dependence, and relapse (Kaye et al, 2017; Strang et al, 2020). Prevalence estimates for these phenotypes vary widely, in part due to variation in ascertaining and defining them (Freda et al, 2021). Indeed, one key challenge to defining opioid use phenotypes is the need to differentiate individuals across this spectrum of overlapping features.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…“Reward Deficiency Syndrome” (RDS) [ 9 ] is a genetically based hypodopaminergia known to affect about one-third of people in the United States [ 10 ]. It is understood that while a few people can tolerate powerful narcotics, and no longer want opioids after being treated for pain even after withdrawal, others, because of genetic and epigenetic insults, become enthralled with addictive-like behaviors after the pain is alleviated [ 11 ]. It is noteworthy that our group recently reported on a study utilizing the Genetic Addiction Risk Severity (GARS) test showing a high drug and alcohol risk in probands attending multipain clinics chronically prescribed opioids.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To include the gene/locus information presented in Fig. 2 (blue bars), we integrated data from a literature search protocol implemented in a previous review [31].…”
Section: Review Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, capturing the greater phenotypic and environmental profile of an individual has the potential to greatly improve risk assessments for POU. The complexity of POU as a measurable trait presents many challenges from a data science perspective due to ambiguous POU-related terms and their complex, but poorly explored, root causes [6,7,28,30,31]. These issues make powerful digital approaches difficult to implement despite many recent advances in the fields of artificial intelligence, bioinformatics, and computational biomedicine.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%