The Philosophy of Nature of Kant, Schelling and Hegel

Wandschneider, Dieter

doi:10.4324/9780203856581.ch3

Cited by 2 publications

(3 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…As Dieter Wandschneider writes, Schelling, "[t]he protagonist of the romantic philosophy formulated the matter in complete conformity with "hen kai pan" (oneness of all), the motto of the three friends-Schelling, Hegel, Hölderlin-studying in the Tübingen Stift: 'the whole of nature [is] connected to a universal organism', and in 'that being, which the most ancient philosophy [had considered] the common soul of nature' (2:569) Schelling saw the 'world-soul'" (2:369). "Nature" Wandschneider continues, "is thus also an appearance of the absolute; matter is 'nothing other than the unconscious part of God' (7:435), 'the extinguished spirit', as it were (3:182; 453), 'the embodiment of divine forces and the first image of the universe' (7:210); nature in its entirety is 'the visible spirit', and spirit conversely is 'the invisible nature' (2:56)" [4] (80). Schelling's ideas are further taken up by Martin Heidegger in Schelling's Treatise on the Essence of Human Freedom (1936) [5].…”

Section: Notesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In the paper, I keep primarily to Hegel, contemporary feminist, and psychoanalytic theory on these questions. Nonetheless, a wider horizon unto which the paper pans out reaches to the ideas taken up and developed by Henri Bergson, Lou-Andreas Salomé, Martin Heidegger, Jean-Paul Sartre, Michel Foucault, Jacques Derrida, Julia Kristeva, and Jacques Lacan, among others 4 . In terms of the contemporary accounts, this paper follows the direction laid out by the discourses that articulate the importance of recovering the primacy of nature-its sacredness-for the continuation of life; both biological life and the life of spirit (which as this paper indicates are thoroughgoingly entwined).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Repression and Return of Nature in Hegel and Beyond

Marren

2023

Philosophies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Taking its departure from the destruction of ethicality (Sittlichkeit), as envisioned by Hegel in the Phänomenologie des Geistes (PG §443–475), this paper constructs a concept of a contemporary subject whose self-reliant autonomy fractures in the face of the truth. This truth is revealed as an upsurge of nature, whose role and significance has been denied in favor of comfort and security of the subject. The move to yoke and subdue nature by placing science—as Bacon saw fit—in service of technology, and by placing technology in service of human comfort and safety, proved to bear fruit. However, this subjugation, and also the abuse of nature, in one and the same move, results in a subjugation and a denigration of the human self.

show abstract

Section: Notesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Repression and Return of Nature in Hegel and Beyond

Marren

2023

Philosophies

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Among the few contributions discussing this notion, seeWandschneider and Leland (2010),Sparby (2015),Gwee (2011), and McGrath (2016). However, none of these contributions put the notion of immanence at the center of their analysis.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Immanence in Schelling and Hegel in the Jena Period

Bubbio¹,

Fulvi²

2022

The Southern J of Philosophy

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this article, we argue that in the Jena period (1801–1803) Schelling and Hegel both rejected the conception of God as coinciding with the moral order, which they attribute to Fichte; such coincidence, in their view, turned God into a transcendent and merely moral Being. In an effort to demonstrate their distance from Fichte's view, we contend, Schelling and Hegel advocated for a metaphysical (rather than merely moral) and immanent (rather than transcendent) understanding of God, conceived in its inextricable relation with nature and self‐consciousness. We conclude by demonstrating that the cooperation between Schelling and Hegel in the Jena period led them to develop an analogous conception of immanence—which already foreshadows, however, the different directions that Schelling and Hegel take in their mature works.

show abstract

The Philosophy of Nature of Kant, Schelling and Hegel

Cited by 2 publications

References 9 publications

Repression and Return of Nature in Hegel and Beyond

Repression and Return of Nature in Hegel and Beyond

Immanence in Schelling and Hegel in the Jena Period

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About