“…Based on the SrCl 2 structural and vibrational results, the following extrapolation can be assumed for SrX 2 (X = F, Cl, Br, I) halides: (i) The closest the crystal structure is predicted to that of experiment, the better agreement between the DFT-calculated vibrational spectra and F I G U R E 1 Raman (black) and infrared (red) spectra of SrCl 2 calculated using different exchange-correlation functionals. The dashed lines represent the experimental Raman and infrared spectra from Denham et al [58] and Hisano et al [59] The frequency of each band is written above (or next) to it in cm À1 their corresponding experimental measurements; (ii) the effect of temperature can be indirectly observed/predicted via DFT calculations, that is, the bigger the cell parameters, the longer the bonds (and subsequently, the weaker the bonds), resulting in lower frequencies, (iii) regardless of how the vibrational frequencies are calculated (i.e., finite difference vs. DFPT), the method developed by Fonari et al [22] can be used to include van der Waals interactions, and the results are accurate, and (iv) based on Equation (1), it can be expected how the vibrational frequencies change as a function of atomic weight as well as the differences between the electronegativities. For instance, SrF 2 should exhibit a higher vibrational frequencies compared with SrCl 2 since the bonding between Sr-F is stronger than that of Sr-Cl, and fluorine atoms are lighter compared with chlorine atoms.…”