2006
DOI: 10.1088/1748-0221/1/08/p08003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Photon-Assisted Cascaded Electron Multiplier: a concept for potential avalanche-ion blocking

Abstract: We present a Photon-Assisted Cascaded Electron Multipliers (PACEM) which has a potential for ion back-flow blocking in gaseous radiation detectors: the avalanche from a first multiplication stage propagates to the successive one via its photons, which in turn induce photoelectron emission from a photocathode deposited on the second multiplier stage; the multiplication process may further continue via electron-avalanche propagation. The photon-mediated stage allows, by a proper choice of geometry and fields, co… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
22
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The main difference between these two structures is the strip pattern present on the bottom face of , and in the region around the anode strips, which is established by the voltage difference between cathode and anode strips, . Compared to the GEM, the MHSP allows for an extra multiplication stage, resulting in higher scintillation and charge gains [1], [18]. In addition, depending on the electric field between the MHSP and the wire mesh, only % of the anode-avalanche ions may drift back through the MHSP holes [19].…”
Section: Experimental Methods and Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The main difference between these two structures is the strip pattern present on the bottom face of , and in the region around the anode strips, which is established by the voltage difference between cathode and anode strips, . Compared to the GEM, the MHSP allows for an extra multiplication stage, resulting in higher scintillation and charge gains [1], [18]. In addition, depending on the electric field between the MHSP and the wire mesh, only % of the anode-avalanche ions may drift back through the MHSP holes [19].…”
Section: Experimental Methods and Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the current measured at the reflective photocathode, , includes the contribution from both photoelectrons induced by the gas scintillation and photoelectrons induced by the direct exposure of the reflective photocathode to the UV photons emitted by the Hg lamp, , the optical gain is given by (1) Both and are measured for null electric fields in the MHSP, i.e., V, and in the GEM, i.e., V, and extraction field of 1.0 kV/cm in the region between the reflective photocathode and the wire mesh . This value was found to ensure good extraction efficiency in the gas, above 90% [7].…”
Section: Experimental Methods and Setupmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations