The photooxidation of azo~~iethane has beell reinvestigated over a range of conversion extending to a t least 7% a t relatively high oxygen pressure and a t 162' C. Kinetic and tracer (added CJ3H20) studies support the view that the forlnaldehyde formed in the reaction can act as a source of the oxides of carbon. These were found to be enriched in C13 in the tracer work.
INTRODUCTIONOne of the puzzling features of the mechanism of the photooxidation of azolnethane (1) has been the nature of the product responsible for the self-inhibition (2, 3) of the reaction. Formaldehyde, nitrous oxide, and "excess nitrogen" (3) are produced a t rates which decrease with the time of exposure. These products are thought (1, 3) to arise via the reactions where R is some radical in the system and [2] and [3] are written as over-all processes which might occur in stages. Provided methyl and methoxyl, or radical products of their reaction with oxygen, can function as R in [I], the elements of a chain reaction are present in the lnechanisln as appears to be required by the data (3).I t was recognized (2, 3) that when this chain was inhibited by some product, the inhibition mechanism must involve the production of carbon monoxide and, probably, of carbon dioxide. The mechanism suggested was a co~npetition for the radicals R by the inhibiting substance, here designated by R'H.
R + R'H --t RH + R'[41 R' + 0 2 --t CO + other products --t COz + other products I t is postulated that the "other products" do not propagate chains to any extent. Initially it was suggested that formaldehyde should be identified as R'I-I (2). While this suggestion led to a satisfactory qualitative explanation of the phenomenon, it was not compatible with later (3) quantitative data. Therefore another n~echanism, which identified R'H with performic acid, was advanced. The purpose of the present work was to obtain data confirming, or otherwise, the hypothesis that formaldehyde could not function as R'H. In addition to a purely ltinetic approach, experiments were done in which formaldehyde-C13 was added to the reaction system. Fro111 a ltinetic point of view the concentration of formaldehyde found a t the end of an experiment, including that formed in the reaction, is indicative of whether or not formaldehyde was consumed in the reaction. If such consumption did indeed lManuscript received Augz~st 2, 1960.