1970
DOI: 10.1007/bf00404239
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The physician questionnaire: A useful tool in psychiatric drug research

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

1970
1970
1977
1977

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These items included 7 point scale ratings of 5 emotional and 5 somatic symptoms. 9 The actual range of change scores obtained ranged from -2 to +4 with positive scores indicative of improvement and negative scores indicative of worsening.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These items included 7 point scale ratings of 5 emotional and 5 somatic symptoms. 9 The actual range of change scores obtained ranged from -2 to +4 with positive scores indicative of improvement and negative scores indicative of worsening.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of particular interest were several significant drug x population interaction effects, indicating that methylphenidate produced significantly more symptomatic improvement than placebo in depressed, general practice patients but not in depressed, private psychiatric patients. These findings were observed after 2 as well as 4 weeks of treatment in the Zung scale (a patient-rated depression inventory), 8 the Physician Questionnaire (a physician rating of psychopathology), 6 and in several global improvement measures.…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%
“…As potential regres sors for the analysis, we chose 32 demographic, treatment expectation, doctor attitude, and psychopathology variables, including the 10 items of our 'physician questionnaire' (3). A global improvement rating of the patient's clinical symptomatic change after 4 weeks of treatment, recorded on a 5-point scale ranging from unimproved (quoted 1) to markedly improved (quoted 5) was used as outcome criterion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%