1977
DOI: 10.1088/0305-4624/8/3/i01
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The physics of explosion containment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1980
1980
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In that study, the elastic response of spherical chambers, which are subjected to a uniformly distributed internal transient pressure, was obtained using an equivalent single degree of freedom (SDoF) system and then expanded to consider its elastic–plastic response (Baker, 1960). White and colleagues (White et al, 1977, White and Trott, 1980) concluded that an increment in the static yield strength of the tank material can improve the agreement between the analytical and experimental results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In that study, the elastic response of spherical chambers, which are subjected to a uniformly distributed internal transient pressure, was obtained using an equivalent single degree of freedom (SDoF) system and then expanded to consider its elastic–plastic response (Baker, 1960). White and colleagues (White et al, 1977, White and Trott, 1980) concluded that an increment in the static yield strength of the tank material can improve the agreement between the analytical and experimental results.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As pointed out by White [2], due to more explosive energy can be absorbed by plastic strain, the shell thickness of the vessel that allows certain plastic deformation is much smaller than that of the elastic design criteria, thereby substantially reducing difficulties in manufacture, transport, storage and disposal [4]. In addition, we discover that some improvements or corrections are needed for the Baker's theory [1]: (1) Analytical solutions in the plastic response phase (including perfect plasticity and linear plasticity) are incorrect after the transient pressure ends and before the elastic motion resumes, neglecting radius variation and shell thinning; (2) No equations of motion and the corresponding solutions are given after the elastic motion resumes, neglecting radius variation and shell thinning; (3) Only equation of motion is given in the plastic deformation phase, considering radius variation and shell thinning. However, in so far as the author has known, Baker's solutions are still widely accepted, such as they are almost completely quoted in the monograph of Yang, where only ε is altered to 2ε for the stressstrain relation in the plastic regime [26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The basic equation of motion still applies, whereas shell thickness h and radius R can change over time in equation (2). As a spherical shell undergoes arbitrary deformation, the relations between displacement, radius and strain are as follows [27],…”
Section: Model 3: Elastic-plastic Response Considering Radius Variati...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations