2015
DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2015.00050
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Physiological Effect of Human Grooming on the Heart Rate and the Heart Rate Variability of Laboratory Non-Human Primates: A Pilot Study in Male Rhesus Monkeys

Abstract: Grooming is a widespread, essential, and complex behavior with social and affiliative valence in the non-human primate world. Its impact at the autonomous nervous system level has been studied during allogrooming among monkeys living in a semi-naturalistic environment. For the first time, we investigated the effect of human grooming to monkey in a typical experimental situation inside laboratory. We analyzed the autonomic response of male monkeys groomed by a familiar human (experimenter), in terms of the hear… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
37
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 103 publications
4
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In our study estimated pulse rates were in the range of 95–125 BPM for monkey Sun, 125–150 BPM for Fla and 160–230 BPM for Mag, which agrees with previously reported values of heart rate (120-250 BPM) for rhesus monkeys sitting in a primate chair [2, 3537]. Performance of our method for pulse rate estimation (Table 5) was only slightly worse than those reported for humans: mean absolute error obtained in [75] was 2.5 BPM; fraction of epochs with error below 6 BPM (about 8% of average human pulse rate) for the best method considered in [45] was achieved for 87% of epochs; reported values of the Pearson correlation coefficient vary from 0.87 in [45] to 1.00 in [25].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In our study estimated pulse rates were in the range of 95–125 BPM for monkey Sun, 125–150 BPM for Fla and 160–230 BPM for Mag, which agrees with previously reported values of heart rate (120-250 BPM) for rhesus monkeys sitting in a primate chair [2, 3537]. Performance of our method for pulse rate estimation (Table 5) was only slightly worse than those reported for humans: mean absolute error obtained in [75] was 2.5 BPM; fraction of epochs with error below 6 BPM (about 8% of average human pulse rate) for the best method considered in [45] was achieved for 87% of epochs; reported values of the Pearson correlation coefficient vary from 0.87 in [45] to 1.00 in [25].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Future studies should take these observations into consideration, especially when performances in juice reward allocation tasks are taken as a proxy of macaque's social motivation in neuroscience (Azzi et al, 2012;Chang et al, 2011). To overcome these methodological and conceptual challenges and study exchanges of positive acts under experimental condition in primates, the use of grooming by the experimenters (or by a dedicated device) might be considered in further investigations (Grandi and Ishida, 2015;Taira and Rolls, 1996). To conclude, by using both positive and negative outcomes, this study has clarified the apparent dichotomy within the scientific literature of reciprocity in nonhuman primates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Allogrooming settles in-group tensions, maintains social bonds, reinforces social hierarchies, and provokes reciprocal prosocial behavior in the form of reciprocal grooming, food sharing, or coalitionary support (de Waal, 1997; Akinyi et al, 2013; Jaeggi and Gurven, 2013; Lutermann et al, 2013; Borgeaud and Bshary, 2015; Garrido et al, 2016; Richard et al, 2016). The parallels between the effects of allogrooming and the effects of gratitude on social behavior are apparent, and a possible link between the social effects of allogrooming and physiology emerges from the observation that when an individual is being groomed, they visibly relax and their heart rate decreases significantly (Grandi and Ishida, 2015). …”
Section: Allogrooming As An Animal Model Of the Physiological Effementioning
confidence: 99%