2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.it.2013.03.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The physiological role of DC-SIGN: A tale of mice and men

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
163
1
2

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 164 publications
(168 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
2
163
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…MMR and DC-SIGN bind both mannose and fucose residues, whereas CLEC10A specifically recognizes a-and b-linked N-acetylgalactosamine. [26][27][28] Each of these carbohydrate structures is present in FX, 29 providing a rationale for a potential interaction between FX and these receptors. However, despite their evident expression in THP1 macrophages (supplemental Figure 1), no colocalization was found when assessed via Duolink-PLA analysis (Figure 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…MMR and DC-SIGN bind both mannose and fucose residues, whereas CLEC10A specifically recognizes a-and b-linked N-acetylgalactosamine. [26][27][28] Each of these carbohydrate structures is present in FX, 29 providing a rationale for a potential interaction between FX and these receptors. However, despite their evident expression in THP1 macrophages (supplemental Figure 1), no colocalization was found when assessed via Duolink-PLA analysis (Figure 2).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DC-SIGN/CD209 and MR/CD206 are the 2 lectins able to bind mannosylated FL BCR in vitro 16 and have been described on dendritic cells and macrophages within normal lymphoid tissues. 20,21 We decided to check for their expression within the FL cell niche. First, we highlighted, by flow cytometry, 25 an overexpression of DC-SIGN on CD3/CD19/CD335 Figure 6).…”
Section: Dc-sign Expression Within Fl Lymph Nodesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning BCR ligands, both DC-SIGN and MR are expressed by various myeloid cell subsets. 20,21 Interestingly, a high number of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) have an adverse prognostic value in FL patients treated with conventional chemotherapy. [22][23][24] …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[17][18][19] As no functional homolog of DC-SIGN exists in mice, 20 we generated humanized mice expressing human DC-SIGN (hSIGN) on conventional DCs. 21 Importantly, delivery of antigens via anti-DC-SIGN monoclonal antibodies (aDC-SIGN) enhances T cell responses in vitro and in vivo.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%