2007
DOI: 10.1093/her/cym003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The pit and the pendulum: the impact on teen smokers of including a designated smoking area in school tobacco control policy

Abstract: Thirty per cent of school districts in British Columbia do not ban smoking outright on school grounds, and in several instances, smoking is permitted in smoking pits, regardless of school district policy. While there is evidence to suggest that enforcing a tobacco-free environment for students does reduce adolescent smoking rates, the concomitant safety and discipline problems it creates for school staff and administration are demanding and complex, and may override concerns regarding student smoking. This stu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…STPs may force adolescents to choose between spending school hours at alternative smokers locations or not (Baillie et al, 2008). Why this dilemma causes social pressures for some adolescents was captured by an adolescent who felt socially isolated because she did not go to the smoker's place as she was "trying to quit … but most of my friends are there" (p. 1013).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…STPs may force adolescents to choose between spending school hours at alternative smokers locations or not (Baillie et al, 2008). Why this dilemma causes social pressures for some adolescents was captured by an adolescent who felt socially isolated because she did not go to the smoker's place as she was "trying to quit … but most of my friends are there" (p. 1013).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enforcing a school tobacco-free environment reduces adolescent smoking rates (Pinilla et al 2002 ), yet imposes demands on staff and teachers that are difficult to uphold (Ashley et al 1998 ). Furthermore, there is contradictory evidence that regulated smoking locations on school property (i.e., smoking pits) are effective at reducing smoking rates among youth (Sussman 1989 ; Ashley et al 1998 ; Baillie et al 2008 ; Kumar et al 2005 ; McBride 2006 ). Sussman ( 1989 ) suggests that these designated areas legitimize smoking.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most studies of the association between school policies and smoking have measured school policies as reported by staff. It has been argued that eliciting students' perspectives on smoking in the school arena should provide additional knowledge about this relationship [9][10][11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%