2019
DOI: 10.17176/20190925-232420-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The plurality of law and development: Reflections on a field in transformation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The time of context-independent transplantation of law and abstract advice for scalable legal reform has thus long passed, and there is a need for a more usercentred approach to understanding how the law works in different contexts (De Souza, 2019b). It is important to keep in mind that while these continuing contestations have redrawn categories and pluralised the movement, the hierarchy of ideas, methods and actors has not vanished and continues to shape the contested identity of L&D (Riegner et al, 2019;Tan, 2019). Significantly, it puts questions of epistemological power centre stage in L&D studies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The time of context-independent transplantation of law and abstract advice for scalable legal reform has thus long passed, and there is a need for a more usercentred approach to understanding how the law works in different contexts (De Souza, 2019b). It is important to keep in mind that while these continuing contestations have redrawn categories and pluralised the movement, the hierarchy of ideas, methods and actors has not vanished and continues to shape the contested identity of L&D (Riegner et al, 2019;Tan, 2019). Significantly, it puts questions of epistemological power centre stage in L&D studies.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%