The political economy and geopolitical context of India's economic crisis, 1990–91

Abstract

The Indian economy suffered a balance of payment crisis in 1991, which provided the context for the rolling out of neoliberal policies, also referred to as the New Economic Policy in India. This paper examines the national and global causes and context of India's economic crisis and adoption of neoliberal policies. While grounding my analysis in historical-geographical materialism, I argue that India's economic crisis was a product of certain contingent conditions. I draw attention to India's pre-neoliberal economic regime and analyse how the earlier-established relationship between revenue generation and expenditure ran into trouble; what changes occurred in the organization and management of revenues and capital; nature of interventions of the state in the circulation of capital; changes in the physical aspects of circulation of commodities, together with foreign trade and the formation of the 'world market'; and the rise of the United States as the only global superpower. I conclude that India's economic crisis of 1990-91, and the neoliberal policies that followed, are products of contingent historical and geographical conditions. A teleological approach towards examining global capitalism and production of economic crisis often neglect such contingencies and provide a set of causalities that may, at best, be classified as incomplete.

Public‐private discord in the land acquisition law: Insights from Rajarhat in India

“…This, however, is not out of context and is an outcome of the post‐world war post Keynesian global policy regime. Like most of the post‐colonial economies, India ran into the great balance of payment crisis in the late 1980s when United States backed World Bank and IMF loan was sought (see Ahmed, for a detailed analysis). It came with the conditionality of liberalizing the hitherto closed and regulated post‐independence Indian economy necessitating structural adjustment and adoption of the neoliberal policies.…”

Governing Foreign Direct Investment: Post-Enron Initiatives in India

“…Such a perspective is particularly useful in examining policy formulations and state endeavors in India where democratic pulls and pressures and social consolidations based on ethnic, regional, caste, class and religious grounds continually form, deform, and reform. My own body of work has examined such contradictions in the production and continual transformation of state (Ahmed 2009; Ahmed 2014; Ahmed, Kundu and Peet 2010; Ahmed and Chatterjee 2016). In this paper, however, I mainly focus on the willed effect of the “government,” the elected representative and bureaucrats, in the production of policy, and in turn the state in the context of corporate power and neoliberalism.…”

Mimicry, friction and trans-urban imaginaries: Mumbai taxis/Singapore-style

“…While Singapore's efforts at building a world-class city are intertwined with nation and state-building projects and production of ''enterprising'' citizens, urban-planning played out differently in Mumbai. Until the late 1980s, India's economy was a protected one where the Indian state gained its legitimacy as a Soviet-style socialist state (Ahmed, 2014). Limits on conspicuous consumption, high taxation and other constraints on the private sector, and creation of a society rooted in ideas of social justice, led the early postcolonial Indian state to follow a strategy of public-sector led planned development (Kohli, 2006;Rudolph and Rudolph, 1987).…”