2016
DOI: 10.1017/s1755048316000134
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Political Economy of Support for Sharia: Evidence from the Russian North Caucasus

Abstract: Many scholars have argued that orthodox Muslims harbor attitudes that are more economically communitarian and politically illiberal, since individuals are seen as embedded within a larger community that places a premium on social order. Yet most studies have ignored the potential of Islam as an ideological platform for political reformers. Religion in general and Islam in particular has mostly been treated as a predictor rather than a derivative of political-economic preferences. This article suggests that, in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 68 publications
(60 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, few, if any, references to Gill (2005; 2008) question this motivation. He is often cited regarding the general utility of religious legitimacy (e.g., Elischer 2019; Mantilla 2019) or to support the argument that state support for religion increases legitimacy and the ease of ruling (e.g., Arikan and Bloom 2019; Dromi and Stabler 2019; Dzutsati, Siroky, and Dzutsev 2016; Ringvee 2015). The few studies which unfavorably reference Gill’s (2005; 2008) arguments tend to question his assumption of rationality and do not address the legitimacy issue (e.g., Larson 2015; Miller 2012).…”
Section: Rational Choice Theory Religion and Legitimacymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, few, if any, references to Gill (2005; 2008) question this motivation. He is often cited regarding the general utility of religious legitimacy (e.g., Elischer 2019; Mantilla 2019) or to support the argument that state support for religion increases legitimacy and the ease of ruling (e.g., Arikan and Bloom 2019; Dromi and Stabler 2019; Dzutsati, Siroky, and Dzutsev 2016; Ringvee 2015). The few studies which unfavorably reference Gill’s (2005; 2008) arguments tend to question his assumption of rationality and do not address the legitimacy issue (e.g., Larson 2015; Miller 2012).…”
Section: Rational Choice Theory Religion and Legitimacymentioning
confidence: 99%