2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2011.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The politics of marginality in Wallowa County, Oregon: Contesting the production of landscapes of consumption

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
11
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous research (Abrams & Gosnell, ) has demonstrated that urban fringe and rural communities are susceptible to turmoil and conflict when leadership fails to take a pro‐active stance toward development, as it did with the example of Fauquier. As demonstrated in the case of Wallowa County, Oregon, we now know that the combined factors of a strong commitment to a rural identity and competing or blurred interests, can further complicate development in areas external to the urban core (Abrams & Gosnell, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Previous research (Abrams & Gosnell, ) has demonstrated that urban fringe and rural communities are susceptible to turmoil and conflict when leadership fails to take a pro‐active stance toward development, as it did with the example of Fauquier. As demonstrated in the case of Wallowa County, Oregon, we now know that the combined factors of a strong commitment to a rural identity and competing or blurred interests, can further complicate development in areas external to the urban core (Abrams & Gosnell, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…In other words, the hiring of a uniting figure that would work well with government and business was effectively a move to rationalize the land use decision process, remove it from the political sphere, and bring in private sector partners. Previous research (Abrams & Gosnell, 2012) has demonstrated that urban fringe and rural communities are susceptible to turmoil and conflict when leadership fails to take a pro-active stance toward development, as it did with the example of Fauquier. As demonstrated in the case of Wallowa County, Oregon, we now know that the combined factors of a strong commitment to a rural identity and competing or blurred interests, can further complicate development in areas external to the urban core (Abrams & Gosnell, 2012).…”
Section: The Director Of Economic Development Was Leading a Great Chamentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In addition, Oregon has some unique farm and food policies, including a very low minimum size for dairies (three cows), which may be related to its smaller farm sizes [41]. Another factor in Oregon, shared by other Western states and states with scenic farmland, is the growing amenity ownership of rural lands in some parts of the state [42]. Farmers and food systems activists have suggested that major changes to farmland ownership are underway in Oregon, based on their own observations and some anecdotal evidence.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These shifts have been accompanied by changes in human relationships to land, as well as a disruption of traditional cultures. As formerly productive landscapes have given way to landscapes of leisure, conservation and consumption, rural communities across the globe have frequently struggled to maintain their identities [25]. In addition, as more people (primarily the PMIC) have migrated to these rural areas and introduced their own values, the characteristics that were responsible for attracting that growth in the first place have been threatened.…”
Section: Rural Transitions: Public Lands Tourism and Amenity Migrationmentioning
confidence: 99%