1993
DOI: 10.2307/2950658
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Politics of Nationalism in Quebec

Abstract: The central argument of this article is straightforward. (1) The contemporary Quebec nationalist movement has moved through phases of mobilization, demobilization, and remobilization. (2) Interpretations of Quebec nationalism do not successfully explain all three phases. (3) A new model of mobilization can provide a more satisfactory account. The goal is to construct a model that is useful for all three phases and that can say something about nationalism and political mobilization more generally.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, the resentment of some provinces over what was perceived as the grant of undue special privileges to Quebec has been as much to blame for the breakdown of territorial management proposals as any intransigence by Quebec. It was the refusal of some provinces to ratify the proposals for change that in 1990 caused the collapse of the Meech Lake Accords, while a negative result in a popular referendum ended the resurrection of the constitutional proposals in the Charlottetown Accord (see Meadwell, 1993).…”
Section: Management Through Politicsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Indeed, the resentment of some provinces over what was perceived as the grant of undue special privileges to Quebec has been as much to blame for the breakdown of territorial management proposals as any intransigence by Quebec. It was the refusal of some provinces to ratify the proposals for change that in 1990 caused the collapse of the Meech Lake Accords, while a negative result in a popular referendum ended the resurrection of the constitutional proposals in the Charlottetown Accord (see Meadwell, 1993).…”
Section: Management Through Politicsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, by the 1960s the Quiet Revolution effectively 'decolonised' Québec, which meant dismantling the de facto CDL that had for decades been upheld by provincial governments and the Catholic Church (Fraser 2001; see also Tetley 1982). The internal colony approach has been met with criticism on a variety of levels and alternative explanations have been offered (see McRoberts 1979;Meadwell 1983;Olzak 1982; see also Bélanger and Pinard 1991;Darroch 1979;Lieberson 1970;Meadwell 1993;Olzak and Nagel 1986). Although these critiques are compelling, I suggest that the utility of the internal colony model lies not necessarily in its ability to explain the emergence of regional variation in Francophone ethnic nationalism (which is not the subject of this article), but rather for the insights it provides on the link between ethnic nationalism and politically motivated out-migration.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In brief, political leaders respond to international opportunities to promote their domestic interests, most explicitly the security and power of the ruling party elite (Meadwell 1991(Meadwell , 1993. Leaders will use violence if it can secure or increase their share of power.…”
Section: Intervention In Ethnic Conflict: Basic Concepts and Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%