2019
DOI: 10.1039/c9py00500e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The poly(propylene oxide-co-ethylene oxide) gradient is controlled by the polymerization method: determination of reactivity ratios by direct comparison of different copolymerization models

Abstract: An investigation of the copolymerization of EO and PO by in situ1H NMR spectroscopy reveals striking differences in the monomer gradient, depending on the polymerization method.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
68
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
4
68
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…3). 53 Importantly due to the truly living nature of anionic polymerisation, 57,58 full monomer conversions were achieved and excellent end-group delity could be maintained, allowing access to diblock copolymers in one pot. 59 In 2019, the same group also presented a theoretical model that enables the accurate prediction of MWD composition for a range of initiator addition proles when polystyrene was synthesised by anionic polymerisation.…”
Section: Temporal Regulation Of Initiationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3). 53 Importantly due to the truly living nature of anionic polymerisation, 57,58 full monomer conversions were achieved and excellent end-group delity could be maintained, allowing access to diblock copolymers in one pot. 59 In 2019, the same group also presented a theoretical model that enables the accurate prediction of MWD composition for a range of initiator addition proles when polystyrene was synthesised by anionic polymerisation.…”
Section: Temporal Regulation Of Initiationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reactivity ratios were determined by fitting the in situ data to the ideal copolymerization model to be r EPB = 0.35 and r EO = 2.8 ( Figure S33, Supporting Information). [29] The results were confirmed by classical aliquot takinga td etermined points in time from the bulk polymerization reaction. Based on these reactivity ratios the averagem icrostructure was depicted for ac opolymer started by ab ifunctionalinitiator with the same compositiona sP (EG 168 -co-EPB 13 ), see Figure1c.…”
Section: Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…To comprehend the monomer sequence distribution during anionic ring‐opening copolymerization, on‐line 1 H NMR measurements—a technique that has been proven extremely useful to monitor polymerization reactions in situ—has been employed during copolymerization of EPB and EO. The reactivity ratios were determined by fitting the in situ data to the ideal copolymerization model to be r EPB =0.35 and r EO =2.8 (Figure S33, Supporting Information) …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high reactivity difference between the two monomers during copolymerization was also confirmed by the reactivity ratios ( r 1 =19 and r 2 =0.052 for M1 / M2 , Table S1) calculated by ideal integrated equation . The microstructure of the block‐like copolymer of M1 and M2 was visualized by using the reactivity ratios (Figure a, bottom).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 62%