2000
DOI: 10.1007/s004170000187
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The polyurethane nasolacrimal duct stent for lower tear duct obstruction: long-term success rate and complications

Abstract: Implantation of a polyurethane nasolacrimal duct stent is an alternative to conventional techniques in lower tear duct obstruction. Its overall success rate is lower than that reported after conventional dacryocystorhinostomy, but the procedure is fast, safe and reversible. Refinement of the surface and stent design may improve results in the future.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many authors agree on the attractiveness of a polyurethane stent used as an alternative to conventional dacryocystorhinostomy because it offers an easy, effective, safe, and reversible way to manage lacrimal drainage problems (Kang et al 2002;Lanciego et al 2001;Pinto et al 2001;Schaudig et al 2000;Wilhelm et al 2002); however, this method has not yet gained widespread acceptance among ophthalmologists and interventional radiologists. This is due to the longterm results which to date are less than favorable.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Many authors agree on the attractiveness of a polyurethane stent used as an alternative to conventional dacryocystorhinostomy because it offers an easy, effective, safe, and reversible way to manage lacrimal drainage problems (Kang et al 2002;Lanciego et al 2001;Pinto et al 2001;Schaudig et al 2000;Wilhelm et al 2002); however, this method has not yet gained widespread acceptance among ophthalmologists and interventional radiologists. This is due to the longterm results which to date are less than favorable.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The nasolacrimal duct system (right eye, frontal view) shows incomplete obstruction of the NLDS (arrow in a). The main problem of the procedure is the ten-dency towards obstruction of the stent by granulation tissue or mucoid material in the proximal portion of the mushroom stent (Schaudig et al 2000). The primary result with these techniques seemed promising (Perena et al 2001;Song et al 1996;Wilhelm et al 1997).…”
Section: Instrumentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparing the results of all existing studies the conclusion met in the present study could almost be expected, however failed to be proven so far. The longer the follow-up period (6 months, 1 year, 2 years) [8,9,11,12,13,21,28,29] the lower was the success rate or the rate of patent stents. The early postoperative [2] to early medium-term [3] results of our patients (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other authors found similar or worse results. Pabon et al [12] reported a stent patency of 72% in a follow-up period of 1 year, and Schaudig and Maas [21] found a success rate of 50% for the same period.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Interestingly, the only contraindication for nasolacrimal stent placement is acute dacryocystitis, while canalicular obstruction, LDS structural malformations, dacryolithiasis, sac neoplasm or previous sinus surgery, which generally preclude balloon dacryocystoplasty, can be considered as relative exclusion criteria (40). Table 2 reports several experiences of nasolacrimal stenting (17,(40)(41)(42)(44)(45)(46)(47)(48)(49).…”
Section: Nasolacrimal Stent Placementmentioning
confidence: 99%