The Polyvocality in Action: Embodying the Epiphany on Public Housing Conundrum

Abstract

Purpose of the study: This paper aims to elaborate on how the institutional logic of public housing provision transforms from the old logic into the new logic. By encapsulating tacit-knowledge from the shift, this study focuses on how to explicate a model of multi-criteria decision-making for executing official residence projects in Indonesia. This research also aims to recuperate the future of the public residency field.
 Methodology: The methodology employed was a mixed method. The qualitative method was firstly applied by utilizing semi-structured interviews to build a decision-making model. Later, a quantitative method was implemented to improve the consistency of the model by using the Analytical Hierarchy Process protocols. Thirteen project representatives and ten decision-makers were being involved as the main informants. Google Sheets web-based software was applied for analyzing survey results by making use of a mathematical model for the Analytical Hierarchy Process.
 Main Findings: The result indicates that land not used as paddy field, fair house price, safe from flood location, serene ambiance, and developer experience has played a significant part in affecting buying decisions for residency projects. To carry out the new method, the total scores of the AHP calculation should be above 50. Otherwise, the government shall opt for the old mechanism.
 Applications of this study: The paper contributes to the public sector accounting field in the area of asset management and public housing procurement. The paper also gives a strong basis for the field to make use of the model of Indonesia's public housing provision. The government can adopt the research framework for choosing the new model or the old one.
 Novelty/Originality of this study: This study might be the only one of its kind. The research was using a multi-method to achieve the objectives. To generate a multi-criteria decision-making model, grounded data of excessive interviews were abstracted. Then the abstracted tacit-knowledge was tested with AHP to provide a consistent model.

Unveiling the “Five Catalysts” for the Success of the Core Tax Project

“…Moreover, the synthesis phase integrated the interview findings with the extant body of literature, positioning the analysis within a broader scholarly discourse, thereby validating or contesting prior studies and forging comprehensive, insightful conclusions (Wardhani et al, 2022). Through this analytical journey, the study aspires to make a substantive contribution to the comprehension of the research subject and to augment the corpus of academic literature on the matter (Qadri & Firmansyah, 2020).…”

Beyond the Tax Code: Enhancing Taxpayer Compliance through Service, Counseling, and Public Relations

“…Halik (2019) contributes to this discourse by asserting that research within the critical paradigm perceives reality as inherently discordant, characterized predominantly by conflict and societal struggle. It is further posited that the objective of critical research transcends mere observation, aiming instead to alter the prevailing imbalances and dominations within societal structures (Pratama et al, 2023;Qadri & Firmansyah, 2020). This ambition is directed towards critiquing and transforming social relations, with critical social research engaging with social reality in pursuit of enacting positive changes or identifying superior alternatives for social organization.…”

Storytelling Case Study: How to Win a Tax Dispute Against Tax Authority?

“…We then analyzed them by enriching descriptions in a specific natural context (Qadri, 2019a). We linked the storied context with secondary data gathered (Qadri & Firmansyah, 2020) by giving more emphasis on the tax audit working sheet of CV Cipta Wirasa which was used as media in expressing the tax auditor's opinion. We present the storied narrative using the storytelling organization techniques of Qadri and Firmansyah (2020).…”