“…But the US Supreme Court has certainly confronted issues with redistributive implications (Michelman, 2008, pp. 677-679), and addressed the treatment of the poor under the Fourteenth Amendment (Rose, 2010). The author missed an opportunity to broach directly the subject of "how the poor fare" in the highest court of the land qua poor people, if only to show whether and how the segregation and stop and frisk cases are illustrative, or at least, connected to, the Court's ideologies concerning poverty and state responsibility for citizens' wellbeing more generally.…”