2022
DOI: 10.1002/csr.2250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The position of financial prudence, social influence, and environmental satisfaction in the sustainable consumption behavioural model: Cross‐market intergenerational investigation during the Covid‐19 pandemic

Abstract: The main purpose of this study is to gain an in‐depth understanding of the impact of financial prudence (FIN) on social influence and environmental satisfaction in the sustainable consumption (SC) behavioural model from a cross‐market intergenerational perspective in the context of COVID‐19. Surprisingly, we discovered that, during the COVID‐19 pandemic, significant differences emerge between the Chinese and European markets in the four factors (social influence, SC behaviour, environmental satisfaction, and F… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 143 publications
(243 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The cue to action was defined as the interpersonal interactions that consumers have within groups where they obtain behavioral information ( Maiman and Becker, 1974 ), which, in the case of this study, these groups are social networks. This construct was adapted from Cui et al (2022) with an item with a Likert scale from 1 totally disagree to 5 totally agree.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The cue to action was defined as the interpersonal interactions that consumers have within groups where they obtain behavioral information ( Maiman and Becker, 1974 ), which, in the case of this study, these groups are social networks. This construct was adapted from Cui et al (2022) with an item with a Likert scale from 1 totally disagree to 5 totally agree.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Being a member of different groups in social networks causes consumers to acquire sustainable purchasing behavior. For example, they choose products with green packaging buy green products or verify the products’ ingredients to ensure that their purchase is sustainable ( Cui et al, 2022 ). The above propose the following hypothesis:…”
Section: Theoretical Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A similar opinion is shared by Dabija et al (2019) who support the fact that the young people of Generation Z express a very strong interest in sustainable development and social responsibility and tend to get involved in actions to protect the environment because they bring them great satisfaction (Ștefănică and Sandu, 2019). Generation Z is more inclined than other generations to purchase ecological products in terms of the satisfaction received (Suchanek and Szmelter-Jarosz, 2019;Cui et al, 2022). This generation is aware of the positive impact and the consistent size of their own and collective contribution to protecting the environment, elements that determine a specific satisfaction.…”
Section: Frontiers In Environmental Sciencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to some studies in the literature, the factors affecting sustainable consumption behaviour are; environmentalism and security (Karalar & Kiracı, 2010), personality traits (Luchs & Mooradian, 2012), environmental orientation and sustainability innovation (Hamid, Khan, Kiani, Shah & Kiani, 2014), total household income (Aksu & Gelibolu, 2015), election architecture (Theotokis & Manganari, 2015), environmental knowledge (Castaneda, Martinez, Marte & Roxas, 2015), spirituality level (Lee, Bahl, Black, Duber-Smith & Vowles, 2016), emotional motives and demographic characteristics , cognitive effects and product characteristics (Trudel, 2019), attitudes (Castaneda et al, 2015;Hamşıoğlu, 2020;Hameed, Khan, Waris & Zainab, 2021), ecological intelligence (Hettiarachchi, 2020), love of nature (Dong, Liu, Li, Yang, Liang & Deng, 2020), environmental values (Elhoushy & Lanzini, 2021), environmental and social effects (Trudel, 2019;Hosta & Zabkar, 2021), motivation (Khan & Hameed, 2019;Soyer & Dittrich, 2021), ability (Soyer & Dittrich, 2021), subjective norms and perceived behavioural control (Hameed et al, 2021), culture and educational degree (Boca, 2021), emotional closeness to nature (Taufique, 2022), self (Trudel, 2019), feared self (Rasool, Cerchione, Centobelli & Oropallo, 2022) and social interaction (Cui, Lissillour, Chebeň, Lančarič & Duan, 2022).…”
Section: Sustainable Consumption Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%