2014
DOI: 10.1123/pes.2013-0052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Post-Activation Potentiation Effect on Squat Jump Performance: Age and Sex Effect

Abstract: This study examined the post-activation potentiation (PAP) effects on squat jump (SJ) performance and on peak rate of force development (RFDpeak) in preadolescent (10-12 y), adolescents (14-15 y) and adults (20-25 y) males and females. All participants performed a SJ with and without prior conditioning stimulus (PAP and control protocol, respectively), consisting of 3 × 3-second maximal isometric squats. Jump height and RFDpeak of the vertical ground reaction force during SJ were assessed before, and at 20 sec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

10
64
2
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
10
64
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Previous investigations have demonstrated that bodyweight exercises may be capable of producing similar magnitudes of performance gains as high load gym-based exercises. The 3.1-3.8% improvements we observed in jump height following repeated bouts of lunging are comparable to the 2.5-5.5% improvements seen with high load squat variations (>80% 1RM) and isometric contractions [1,3,30]. In further support of our data, previous studies of low load box jumps have reported gains in vertical jump performance [5,6].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Previous investigations have demonstrated that bodyweight exercises may be capable of producing similar magnitudes of performance gains as high load gym-based exercises. The 3.1-3.8% improvements we observed in jump height following repeated bouts of lunging are comparable to the 2.5-5.5% improvements seen with high load squat variations (>80% 1RM) and isometric contractions [1,3,30]. In further support of our data, previous studies of low load box jumps have reported gains in vertical jump performance [5,6].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…These physiological enhancements lead to intensified type-II motor unit recruitment, increased actin-myosin cross-bridge activity within muscle fibres and decreased inhibition of the Golgi apparatus (Chiu et al, 2003;Hilfiker et al, 2007;Sale, 2004;Xenofondos et al, 2010) causing a more powerful contraction of the muscle and observed improvement in anaerobic sprint speed. The improved performance in adolescent population used in the present investigation is contrary to the PAP and repeated sprint performance 3 findings reported in similar aged populations (Arabatzi et al, 2014;Till & Cooke, 2009). This finding may relate to the repeated sprint task being more sensitive to the physiological changes that occur than events such as a squat or counter jump task.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 84%
“…For instance although children and adults demonstrated similar PAP levels in terms of twitch torque (Pääsuke, 2000), children are not able to improve their jumping performance as adults do after a conditioning stimulus (Arabatzi et al, 2014). This indicates that deterioration in technique could mask the PAP effect, especially immediately after the conditioning stimulus when the fatigue effect is more prominent.…”
Section: Responsibility Of the Organizing Committee Of The Conferencementioning
confidence: 88%