2019
DOI: 10.1038/s41433-019-0417-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The potential and value of objective eye tracking in the ophthalmology clinic

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
13
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…EMR is particularly valuable for patients with oscillatory eye movements as it can reveal the underlying nystagmus waveform that distinguishes various types of nystagmus and saccadic oscillations. EMR recording can also detect abnormal smooth pursuit, saccades, OKN, and vestibular responses depending on the type of equipment at hand [ 34 ].…”
Section: Basic Clinical Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EMR is particularly valuable for patients with oscillatory eye movements as it can reveal the underlying nystagmus waveform that distinguishes various types of nystagmus and saccadic oscillations. EMR recording can also detect abnormal smooth pursuit, saccades, OKN, and vestibular responses depending on the type of equipment at hand [ 34 ].…”
Section: Basic Clinical Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The testability of the group was 75% and should be evaluated on a larger group. Lower testability in children with nystagmus is expected, since other clinical findings such as abnormal head posture, head shaking, flickering eyes, and other neurological conditions associated with nystagmus can influence eye tracking data quality [29,30]. Lower testability of children with visual impairment (38%) compared to children with normal vision (64%) on 4 alternative choice PL task, assessed with gaze tracking, has been recently also demonstrated by Barsingerhorn et al [15].…”
Section: Discussion/conclusionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Electronic devices are usually more accessible and less expensive than specialized tests, as well as more robust to degradation over time. Furthermore, using electronic devices for testing opens the possibility to automate the tests, making them faster and easier to use [18]. All these advantages combined suggest that electronic tests may outperform the more traditional physical tests in current clinical practice and may pose lower demands on the skillset required by the operators, e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%