Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR) technologies may be needed to meet climate change targets.Currently full understanding of public attitudes towards such approaches is lacking. Here we report a mixed-methods study on public perceptions of CDR in the US and UK, focusing on bioenergy with carbon capture and storage, direct air capture and terrestrial enhanced rock weathering. A discourse of climate urgency had a substantial impact on perceptions, with CDR seen as offering too slow a response to the climate crisis. CDR also fails to reflect long-term hopes for a sustainable world, being interpreted as not addressing the root causes of climate change. A social license to operate may therefore depend upon resolving these temporal dilemmas regarding both the short and long-term implications of technology development. While research under well-controlled conditions is likely to be acceptable, at-scale deployment without corresponding efforts to reduce emissions may represent a red line for many people.The Paris Agreement on climate change stipulates the requirement to pursue efforts to limit the average global temperature increase to 1.5°C 1 , and several countries have committed to goals of net carbon neutrality by 2050. However, residual emissions from difficult-to-decarbonise sectors such as aviation and agriculture mean that this will be challenging to meet through emissions reduction alone. In order to achieve net zero across an economy as a whole there might be a need to simultaneously remove an equivalent amount of CO2 from the atmosphere using Carbon Dioxide Removal (CDR) 2 .CDR comprises a range of different proposals, from those widely practiced such as afforestation, to those still at concept stage. "o e of the e e , e gi ee ed app oa hes su h as Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS), Direct Air Capture (DAC) and Enhanced Rock Weathering (ERW) might have the potential for long-term sequestration of large quantities of CO2 3 . Of these, BECCS is the best understood and has the highest Technology Readiness Level, but there is considerable uncertainty over sequestration potential and cost for all three (see ref. 4 for a review).Public attitudes and risk perceptions are important for novel technologies, as illustrated by controversies over genetic modification, fracking for shale gas, and early Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) [5][6][7] . For novel CDR, as e e gi g te h ologies, u de sta di g itize ie s th ough upst ea e gage e t a fa ilitate o e ethical and effective technology development 8 . Going beyond techno-scientific assessments, the actual scalable potential of CDR will depend on socio-political factors, including public perceptions (and their influence on political mandates), uptake by relevant market actors, and successful development of a social license to operate 2,9 . While public attitudes will not be the only factor driving development and deployment of CDR at scale, the current limited evidence on them represents an important gap in our understanding of the real-world potential of CDR 10 ....