2013
DOI: 10.1109/tasl.2012.2213248
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Potential for Speech Intelligibility Improvement Using the Ideal Binary Mask and the Ideal Wiener Filter in Single Channel Noise Reduction Systems: Application to Auditory Prostheses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
49
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(55 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
49
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For intelligibility to be maintained with the IBM, the optimal LC should change according to the overall mixture SNR (as in [5]). Compared with the IBM, the IWF does not depend on the setting of an LC, it is more robust to estimation errors and it is preferred in terms of perceived quality [9,10,22]. Thus, the IWF was expected to present a more reliable training target for speech enhancement purposes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For intelligibility to be maintained with the IBM, the optimal LC should change according to the overall mixture SNR (as in [5]). Compared with the IBM, the IWF does not depend on the setting of an LC, it is more robust to estimation errors and it is preferred in terms of perceived quality [9,10,22]. Thus, the IWF was expected to present a more reliable training target for speech enhancement purposes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, the ideal Wiener filter (IWF) (also known as ideal ratio mask, IRM) applies a gradual weight to each T-F unit according to its local SNR and does not depend on the choice of a LC [8,9]. Listening tests conducted with NH listeners have shown that the IWF is less sensitive to estimation errors, leads to higher intelligibility scores in low SNR conditions, and is preferred in terms of perceived quality compared with the IBM [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the ideal case (i.e. when the speech and noise components are known), these algorithms can lead to highly increased intelligibility, close to that for noise-free speech for NH listeners (Madhu et al., 2013) and CI users (Koning et al., 2015, Mauger et al., 2012a, Qazi et al., 2013). Similarly, extensive studies on the SI benefits of time-frequency masking with the ideal binary mask (IBM) support the potential of SNR-based suppression criteria for improving the intelligibility of speech in noise (Anzalone et al., 2006, Brungart et al., 2006, Hu and Loizou, 2008, Wang et al., 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Binary mask was proposed by Cooke et al in 2001 in the context of complex auditory scene analysis (CASA) applications [5]. The idea is to suppress noise-dominant timefrequency units, keeping information in which the target signal power is dominant over noise [3] [6]. Such approach counts on the ability of the human hearing to deal with missing data to reconstitute audio cognition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%