The potential impact of austerity on attainment of the Sustainable Development Goals in Brazil

Abstract

In the recent decades, Brazil has outperformed comparable countries in its progress toward meeting the Millennium Development Goals. Many of these improvements have been driven by investments in health and social policies. In this article, we aim to identify potential impacts of austerity policies in Brazil on the chances of achieving the sustainable development goals (SDGs) and its consequences for population health. Austerity’s anticipated impacts are assessed by analysing the change in federal spending on different budget programmes from 2014 to 2017. We collected budget data made publicly available by the Senate. Among the selected 19 programmes, only 4 had their committed budgets increased, in real terms, between 2014 and 2017. The total amount of extra money committed to these four programmes in 2017, above that committed in 2014, was small (BR$9.7 billion). Of the 15 programmes that had budget cuts in the period from 2014 to 2017, the total decrease amounted to BR$60.2 billion (US$15.3 billion). In addition to the overall large budget reduction, it is noteworthy that the largest proportional reductions were in programmes targeted at more vulnerable populations. In conclusion, it seems clear that the current austerity policies in Brazil will probably damage the population’s health and increase inequities, and that the possibility of meeting SDG targets is lower in 2018 than it was in 2015.

Why do some countries do better or worse in life expectancy relative to income? An analysis of Brazil, Ethiopia, and the United States of America

“…For example, in Ethiopia, neoliberal approaches to public policy are encroaching, as demonstrated by recently approved legislation enabling the privatization of public services [ 55 , 134 ]. The election of Bolsonaro in Brazil is heralding policy directions less supportive of population health [ 135 , 136 ]. In the United States, life expectancy is falling [ 137 ], and the policies of the current administration that are not supportive of population health may contribute to a further decline [ 138 – 142 ].…”

Mudanças no financiamento da Atenção Primária à Saúde no Sistema de Saúde Brasileiro: avanço ou retrocesso?

“…Since 2015, these problems were aggravated by changes in the country's economic and political context. In 2016, a constitutional amendment that froze federal spending for 20 yearswas approved, dramatically compromising the budget of social policies 9 .…”

Enhancing citizenship through nursing care in Brazil: Patients' struggle against austerity policies

“…The best available evidence shows that income inequality, in turn, is associated with lower self‐rated health (McCartney et al, ). Austerity measures implemented by the most recent Brazilian governments has been threatening the hard‐earned achievements of the SUS in its pursuit to provide universal health care (Castro et al, ; Massuda et al, ; Souza et al, ). Similar detrimental effects of austerity measures in health care have been shown in other countries such as Cyprus (Petrou, ), Finland (Saltman & Teperi, ), Portugal (Morais Nunes, Cunha Ferreira, & Campos Fernandes, ), and in many other countries (Horridge et al, ; Ruckert & Labonté, ), even as evidence shows that local and national public health interventions are highly cost‐saving (Masters, Anwar, Collins, Cookson, & Capewell, ).…”