1982
DOI: 10.1007/bfb0012784
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The power of non-rectilinear holes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0
2

Year Published

1983
1983
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
41
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…An illustration is given in Figure 2(b), where the object consists of two approximate convex parts p 1 and p 2 , connected by a non-convex junction q 12 . Since exact convex decomposition is NP-hard for shapes with holes [16], there are many approximate solutions proposed in the literature (eg. [17]).…”
Section: Approximate Convex Decompositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An illustration is given in Figure 2(b), where the object consists of two approximate convex parts p 1 and p 2 , connected by a non-convex junction q 12 . Since exact convex decomposition is NP-hard for shapes with holes [16], there are many approximate solutions proposed in the literature (eg. [17]).…”
Section: Approximate Convex Decompositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case that Steiner points are allowed, the problem can be solved in O(n + r 3 ) time [5]. For polygons with holes, the problem is NP-hard in both cases [16].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Restricted to simple polygons, these problems have efficient solutions. Keil and Snoeyink [22] gave an O(n 3 ) time algorithm for computing the minimum number convex partition of a simple polygon with n vertices; this problem is NP-hard for polygons with holes [32]. Chazelle and Dobkin [9] gave an O(n 3 ) time algorithm for the minimum number convex Steiner partition of a simple polygon with n vertices.…”
Section: Our Contribution (I)mentioning
confidence: 99%