2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.icarus.2012.06.044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Poynting–Robertson effect: A critical perspective

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, Burns et al (2014) explain that the primed quantities used in their equation are equivalent to the unprimed values in equation (5) to low order in v/c; this difference in quantities has previously been identified (Klačka et al 2014). …”
Section: Acceleration Due To Absorbed Radiationmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Also, Burns et al (2014) explain that the primed quantities used in their equation are equivalent to the unprimed values in equation (5) to low order in v/c; this difference in quantities has previously been identified (Klačka et al 2014). …”
Section: Acceleration Due To Absorbed Radiationmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…[21], and references therein). Recently, a debate regarding the physical foundations of PR effect between Klačka et al and Burns et al has appeared in the literature [38][39][40].…”
Section: Discussion and Interpretation Of The Obtained Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The acceleration of moving spherical dust particles caused by the electromagnetic radiation is the PR effect (Poynting 1904;Robertson 1937;Klačka 1992Klačka , 2004Klačka et al 2014). The acceleration is…”
Section: Electromagnetic Radiationmentioning
confidence: 99%