2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11528-016-0071-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Practical Application of e-Portfolios in K-12 Classrooms: An Exploration of Three Web 2.0 Tools by Three Teachers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Limitations about Voki, which is one of the online environments used in the study, was also expressed by Yona and Marlina (2014). Karlin et al (2016) experienced similar limitations with various other online environments. Since these environments are all online, some of the limitations were related to environment updates, whilst content limitations were overcome with alternative online environment usage.…”
Section: Conclusion Discussion and Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Limitations about Voki, which is one of the online environments used in the study, was also expressed by Yona and Marlina (2014). Karlin et al (2016) experienced similar limitations with various other online environments. Since these environments are all online, some of the limitations were related to environment updates, whilst content limitations were overcome with alternative online environment usage.…”
Section: Conclusion Discussion and Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…The most important online environment advantage was stated by the teacher as ease of use. Karlin et al (2016) expressed that teachers that use various Web 2.0 environment reported on their ease of use.…”
Section: Conclusion Discussion and Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Þannig getur sjálfstraust þeirra aukist sem hefur bein áhrif á námsárangur (Niguidula, 2005). Með því að skapa umgjörð og halda utan um eigið nám getur ferilbókagerð gefið nemendum taekifaeri til þess að vera virkir þátttakendur í eigin merkingarsköpun (Love og Cooper, 2004) ásamt að gefa þeim taekifaeri til ríkari hlutdeildar í eigin námi og aukið eignarhald nemenda (Abrami og Barret, 2005;Heide, Karlin, Miles og Ozogul, 2016). Þegar nemendur takast á við verkefni sem þeir hafa gott vald á getur skuldbinding þeirra aukist (Shernoff, Csikszentmihalyi, Schneider og Shernoff, 2014;Wang og Holcombe, 2010).…”
Section: Umgjörð Og Yfirsýn á Námunclassified
“…From the intersection of the various instruments of formative assessment of the national and international research circle of the aforementioned authors, the inclusion of other instruments by other authors, equally relevant, is added. The instruments are as follows: Exit Cards -Patka et al [11]; Portfolios -Karlin et al [12]; Think-Pair-Share, Pass the Question, Muddiest Point, Two-tier Multiple-Choice Questions, Student generated test questions, Concept Card Mapping -Cullinane [13].…”
Section: Tools For Formative Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%