1994
DOI: 10.1002/9780470142790.ch7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Prebiotic Synthesis of Organic Molecules and Polymers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In contrast, both 5-methylcytosine and uracil undergo photohydration, which can ultimately lead to genome damage. If alternate xanthine bases were available in prebiotic times, then the selection of today’s canonical purine bases over hypoxanthine as a genetic information carrier must have an explanation beyond UV hardiness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, both 5-methylcytosine and uracil undergo photohydration, which can ultimately lead to genome damage. If alternate xanthine bases were available in prebiotic times, then the selection of today’s canonical purine bases over hypoxanthine as a genetic information carrier must have an explanation beyond UV hardiness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Without a fossil record of the prebiotic chemical world we are left to conjecture to understand the road map that led to RNA and DNA. [1][2][3] The key components of the reproductive machinery are unlikely to have been selected by a biological evolution that requires that very machinery to begin with. Instead it is conceivable that the choice of the molecular building blocks of life was mediated by a chemical selection that preceded biology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The appearance of ribonucleic acids (RNA) was the start of life due to its information storage capability and enzymatic functional properties. Thus, revealing the origin of RNA is essential for understanding the origin of life in the RNA world theory. In the photophysical and photochemical aspects, it is generally assumed that the canonical nucleobases are favored to serve as chromophores in RNA due to their excellent photostability, which is reflected by their ultrafast excited state dynamics. However, many studies have suggested that the canonical nucleobases which is common to today’s biology may have been preceded by alternative bases during the chemical evolution that took place before the RNA world. Biological modification and total chemical synthesis have provided large variety of minor nucleosides which could be possible ancestor nucleobases for prebiotic RNA. By studying the excited state dynamics of those nucleic base derivatives we hope to learn the impact of photostability which may have led to the selection of today’s canonical bases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%