2023
DOI: 10.3390/molecules28135248
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Prediction of Antioxidant Q-Markers for Angelica dahurica Based on the Dynamics Change in Chemical Compositions and Network Pharmacology

Abstract: Objective: To clarify the accumulation and mutual transformation patterns of the chemical components in Angelica dahurica (A. dahurica) and predict the quality markers (Q-Markers) of its antioxidant activity. Method: The types of and content changes in the chemical components in various parts of A. dahurica during different periods were analyzed by using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry technology (GC-MS). The antioxidant effect of the Q-Markers was predicted using network pharmacological networks, and mol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, α-pinene, β-phellandrene, β-terpinene, 3-carene, β-cubebene and ocimene and so on existed both in A. dahurica leaves and roots but with their relative contents differed in these two parts. Gao et al [ 18 ] applied GC-MS for comparing the volatile profiles of A. dahurica roots, leaves and stems during different growth periods. However, methanol instead of hexane was used for chemical extraction that making the results incomparable with the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, α-pinene, β-phellandrene, β-terpinene, 3-carene, β-cubebene and ocimene and so on existed both in A. dahurica leaves and roots but with their relative contents differed in these two parts. Gao et al [ 18 ] applied GC-MS for comparing the volatile profiles of A. dahurica roots, leaves and stems during different growth periods. However, methanol instead of hexane was used for chemical extraction that making the results incomparable with the present study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%