2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2015.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The prediction of mechanical performance of isotactic polypropylene on the basis of processing conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
36
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
5
36
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This illustrates the before mentioned difficulties. For a given crystal phase, the yield stress is correlated to the lamellar thickness; an increase of about 2 nm in the lamellar thickness of α ‐IPP yields an increase of approximately 8 MPa in the yield stress . This gives rise to the presumption that an additional feature like the crystal unit cell structure or the accompanying amount of imperfections affects the level of the yield stress as well.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This illustrates the before mentioned difficulties. For a given crystal phase, the yield stress is correlated to the lamellar thickness; an increase of about 2 nm in the lamellar thickness of α ‐IPP yields an increase of approximately 8 MPa in the yield stress . This gives rise to the presumption that an additional feature like the crystal unit cell structure or the accompanying amount of imperfections affects the level of the yield stress as well.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The measured scattering intensity could be transposed into the 1D scattering intensity using Lorentz correction. If the electron density differences in one direction are known, the average lamellar thickness l c could be obtained from [40]:…”
Section: Saxs and Waxsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model implies that the reciprocal crystalline lamellar thickness dc1 is governed by supercooling below the equilibrium melting point Tf that deduced from Gibbs‐Thomsom equation . Although it had been accepted by the main stream of polymer physics society, this model was not able to give excellent explanations of recent experimental findings based on time‐ and temperature‐dependent small angle X‐ray scattering (SAXS) measurements during polymer crystallization and melting . It was always observed that the crystallization temperature T c and the melting temperature T m of polymers were linearly dependent on the reciprocal crystalline layer thickness dc1 separately, which exhibited different slopes and different limiting temperatures at dc1 = 0.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%