The predictive validity of the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire and the clinicians' prognostic assessment following manual therapy treatment of patients with LBP and neck pain

Dagfinrud, Hanne; Storheim, Kjersti; Magnussen, Liv Heide; Ødegaard, Thomas T.; Hoftaniska, I.; Larsen, Leo; Ringstad, P.O.; Hatlebrekke, F.; Grotle, Margreth

doi:10.1016/j.math.2012.08.002

Cited by 30 publications

(25 citation statements)

References 24 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The original (long-form) version has not previously been translated into German and tested for its psychometric properties. To date, OMPSQ has been mainly used in patients with LBP, and few authors have reported using OMPSQ in patients with neck pain [ 13 , 14 ]. They concluded that OMPSQ could be used as tool for predicting functional outcomes at 8 weeks after the initial manual therapy assessment in patients with LBP, whereas the ability for predicting outcomes of patients with neck pain is uncertain.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Validation of the Orebro musculoskeletal pain screening questionnaire in patients with chronic neck pain

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectivesTo validate the German version of OMPSQ (OMPSQ-G) for patients with chronic neck pain.ResultsAfter translating OMPSQ to German, we assessed the discriminant validity between patients and healthy adults. Convergent validity was assessed using Pearson’s correlation coefficients between domains of OMPSQ-G and the German version of neck disability index (NDI-G) and visual analogue scale (VAS) of neck pain intensity. Floor and ceiling effects, internal consistency, test–retest and relative reliability were assessed. Fifty patients with chronic neck pain (mean age, 43.6 years; 34 females) and 24 healthy adults (mean age, 50.4 years; 18 females) participated. Mann–Whitney U tests showed significant differences in OMPSQ scores between both groups at the baseline (z = − 4.6; p < 0.001) and second time point (z = − 4.8; p < 0.001). OMPSQ-G scores highly and moderately correlated with NDI-G (ρ = 0.70) and VAS (ρ = 0.41) scores, respectively. There were no floor or ceiling effects. Cronbach’s alpha was 0.94. OMPSQ-G showed high reliability (intraclass correlation 2.1: 0.93; standard error of measurement, 6.9; smallest detectable change, 20 points). The Bland–Altman plot indicated no systematic error. OMPSQ-G showed good validity and reliability in patients with neck pain.Trial registration NCT02540343Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s13104-018-3269-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Validation of the Orebro musculoskeletal pain screening questionnaire in patients with chronic neck pain

et al. 2018

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In addition, the pressure algometry depends on the perception of the patients but not on the perception of the tester. Prior to the results of this study, there was no good reference standard for an early pain stage [ 11 – 13 ], and only at an early pain stage there are patients certainly blind to their condition who do not differ substantially in terms of medication.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Because imaging and laboratory findings often seem to correspond to the symptoms at the first evaluation, diagnosing functional pain by the exclusion of nociceptive and neuropathic pain is difficult [ 3 , 8 ]. When pain is functional, namely, prolonged by central nervous system sensitization [ 5 , 7 ], nociceptive stimuli such as whiplash-associated pain syndrome or osteoarthritis and inflammation are often mistaken for its cause [ 3 , 11 – 13 ]. The diagnostic process involves repetitions of, for instance, computer tomographies, electromyographies, infiltrations of local anesthetics, surgery, and extensive laboratory examinations [ 3 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Despite the importance of distinguishing functional from nociceptive and neuropathic pain early, screening tests are still missing in primary care [ 4 , 11 – 13 ]. Techniques to measure pressure pain sensitivity, summarized as electronic algometry, are very precise (one kilopascal), but expensive, and thus only used in specialized centers and studies [ 14 – 17 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Cost-Saving Early Diagnosis of Functional Pain in Nonmalignant Pain: A Noninferiority Study of Diagnostic Accuracy

Cámara

Merz

Wegmann

et al. 2016

Pain Research and Treatment

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objectives. We compared two index screening tests for early diagnosis of functional pain: pressure pain measurement by electronic diagnostic equipment, which is accurate but too specialized for primary health care, versus peg testing, which is cost-saving and more easily manageable but of unknown sensitivity and specificity. Early distinction of functional (altered pain perception; nervous sensitization) from neuropathic or nociceptive pain improves pain management. Methods. Clinicians blinded for the index screening tests assessed the reference standard of this noninferiority diagnostic accuracy study, namely, comprehensive medical history taking with all previous findings and treatment outcomes. All consenting patients referred to a university hospital for nonmalignant musculoskeletal pain participated. The main analysis compared the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of both index screening tests. Results. The area under the ROC curve for peg testing was not inferior to that of electronic equipment: it was at least 95% as large for finger measures (two-sided p = 0.038) and at least equally as large for ear measures (two-sided p = 0.003). Conclusions. Routine diagnostic testing by peg, which is accessible for general practitioners, is at least as accurate as specialized equipment. This may shorten time-to-treatment in general practices, thereby improving the prognosis and quality of life.

show abstract

“…Total scores are computed from 21 items and the maximum total score is 210 (15). In the present study, the participants were classi ed into three sub-scales (16): women with low risk for long-term disability (ÖMPQ <90), women with moderate risk for long-term disability (ÖMPQ = 90-105) and women with high risk for long-term disability (ÖMPQ > 105).…”

Section: öRebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire (öMpq)mentioning

confidence: 99%

The Relationship Between Musculoskeletal Pains, Serum Estradiol Level and Climacteric Symptoms in Postmenopausal Women

Mohamadzade¹,

Sadatmahalleh²,

Ziaei³

et al. 2020

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Due to the decrease of estrogen levels in postmenopausal females, menopause can be associated with musculoskeletal pains. This study was designed to assess the possible association between musculoskeletal pains, serum estradiol level, and climacteric symptoms in postmenopausal women.Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted on 307 postmenopausal females selected by convenience sampling method. Data collection procedure lasted from October 2016 to September 2018. The required data were collected using the Menopause Rating Scale (MRS), Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire (ÖMPQ), and a questionnaire containing personal data. The blood sample was taken to measure the estradiol level. Results: There was a direct relationship between musculoskeletal pains and menopause symptoms (p<0.001), age (p=0.03), parity (p=0.01), and BMI (p=0.03) and an indirect association between musculoskeletal pain and marriage age (p=0.009), age of first pregnancy (0.017), estradiol level (p<0.001) and education level (p=0.002). The regression analysis results showed that menopause symptoms were the strongest predictor of musculoskeletal pains among all the variables.Conclusions: The findings of the present study showed that although various parameters are associated with musculoskeletal pains, climacteric symptoms are the most important predictive parameters of musculoskeletal pains.

show abstract

The predictive validity of the Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire and the clinicians' prognostic assessment following manual therapy treatment of patients with LBP and neck pain

Cited by 30 publications

References 24 publications

Validation of the Orebro musculoskeletal pain screening questionnaire in patients with chronic neck pain

Validation of the Orebro musculoskeletal pain screening questionnaire in patients with chronic neck pain

Cost-Saving Early Diagnosis of Functional Pain in Nonmalignant Pain: A Noninferiority Study of Diagnostic Accuracy

The Relationship Between Musculoskeletal Pains, Serum Estradiol Level and Climacteric Symptoms in Postmenopausal Women

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About